Linux ACPI
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] fix a deadlock in hotplug case
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:59:36 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906231559.37255.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1245723629.15520.52.camel@rzhang-dt>

On Monday 22 June 2009 8:20:29 pm Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 05:54 +0800, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Sunday 21 June 2009 09:31:15 pm Zhang Rui wrote:
> > > we used to run the hotplug code in keventd_wq.
> > > But when hot removing the ACPI battery device,
> > > power_supply_unregister invokes flush_scheduled_work.
> > > This causes a deadlock.
> > > Introduce a new workqueue for hotplug in this patch.
> > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13533
> > 
> > Can you be specific about how the deadlock occurs?  That will
> > make it easier to make sure we don't re-introduce the deadlock
> > if this design is ever changed in the future.  And I will probably
> > try to change this design, so this is really a self-serving
> > request :-)
> > 
> > I suspect the deadlock is something like this:
> > 
> >   <user removes battery, platform generates system-level notify>
> >     acpi_bus_notify
> >       blocking_notifier_call_chain
> >         acpi_dock_notifier_call
> >           acpi_os_hotplug_execute(acpi_dock_deferred_cb, ...)
> >             __acpi_os_execute(..., acpi_dock_deferred_cb, ...)
> >               schedule_work(<acpi_dock_deferred_cb>)
> >                 queue_work(keventd_wq, <acpi_dock_deferred_cb>)
> >                   <acpi_dock_deferred_cb queued for execution in keventd_wq>
> > 
> >   worker_thread(keventd_wq)
> >     acpi_os_execute_hp_deferred
> >       acpi_dock_deferred_cb
> >         dock_notify
> >           hotplug_dock_devices
> >             dock_remove_acpi_device
> >               acpi_bus_trim
> >                 acpi_bus_remove
> >                   device_release_driver
> >                     acpi_device_remove
> >                       acpi_battery_remove
> >                         sysfs_remove_battery
> >                           power_supply_unregister
> >                             flush_scheduled_work
> >                               flush_workqueue(keventd_wq)
> > 
> > Now we're waiting for keventd_wq to be flushed, but it won't be
> > considered flushed until acpi_os_execute_hp_deferred() completes.
> > 
> exactly.
> 
> > This sort of analysis is obviously way too long and too specific
> > for a source code comment, but it would be nice to have it in the
> > bugzilla, at least.
> > 
> > And maybe the changelog could mention that flush_scheduled_work()
> > applies to keventd_wq, just to close the loop there.
> > 
> > The source code comment:
> > 
> > > +/* 
> > > + * run the hotplug code in a seperate workqueue
> > > + * to avoid the deadlock issue
> > > + */
> > 
> > should be more specific about what "the deadlock issue" is.
> > Maybe something like:
> > 
> >   /*
> >    * We can't run hotplug code in keventd_wq because the hotplug
> >    * code may call driver .remove() functions, which often use
> >    * flush_scheduled_work() to wait for keventd_wq to be flushed.
> >    */
> > 
> > And it might make more sense to put the comment where the queue
> > is used, i.e., in __acpi_os_execute(), rather than at the definition.
> > 
> good point.
> Refreshed patch attached.

Thanks!  Your changelog makes it a lot more clear.  I added the
full analysis from above to the bugzilla as well.

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>

> we used to run the hotplug code in keventd_wq.
> But when hot removing the ACPI battery device,
> power_supply_unregister invokes flush_scheduled_work.
> This causes a deadlock. i.e
> 1. When dock is unplugged, all the hotplug code is run on kevent_wq.
> 2. the hotplug code removes all the child devices of dock device.
> 3. removing the child device may invoke flush_scheduled_work
> 4. flush_scheduled_work waits until all the work on kevent_wq to be
>    finished, while this will never be true because the hotplug code
>    is running on keventd_wq...
> 
> Introduce a new workqueue for hotplug in this patch.
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13533
> 
> Tested-by: Paul Martin <pm@debian.org>
> Tested-by: Vojtech Gondzala <vojtech.gondzala@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/osl.c |   25 ++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ static acpi_osd_handler acpi_irq_handler
>  static void *acpi_irq_context;
>  static struct workqueue_struct *kacpid_wq;
>  static struct workqueue_struct *kacpi_notify_wq;
> +static struct workqueue_struct *kacpi_hotplug_wq;
>  
>  struct acpi_res_list {
>  	resource_size_t start;
> @@ -192,8 +193,10 @@ acpi_status acpi_os_initialize1(void)
>  {
>  	kacpid_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("kacpid");
>  	kacpi_notify_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("kacpi_notify");
> +	kacpi_hotplug_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("kacpi_hotplug");
>  	BUG_ON(!kacpid_wq);
>  	BUG_ON(!kacpi_notify_wq);
> +	BUG_ON(!kacpi_hotplug_wq);
>  	return AE_OK;
>  }
>  
> @@ -206,6 +209,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_os_terminate(void)
>  
>  	destroy_workqueue(kacpid_wq);
>  	destroy_workqueue(kacpi_notify_wq);
> +	destroy_workqueue(kacpi_hotplug_wq);
>  
>  	return AE_OK;
>  }
> @@ -716,6 +720,7 @@ static acpi_status __acpi_os_execute(acp
>  	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
>  	struct acpi_os_dpc *dpc;
>  	struct workqueue_struct *queue;
> +	work_func_t func;
>  	int ret;
>  	ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_EXEC,
>  			  "Scheduling function [%p(%p)] for deferred execution.\n",
> @@ -740,15 +745,17 @@ static acpi_status __acpi_os_execute(acp
>  	dpc->function = function;
>  	dpc->context = context;
>  
> -	if (!hp) {
> -		INIT_WORK(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_deferred);
> -		queue = (type == OSL_NOTIFY_HANDLER) ?
> -			kacpi_notify_wq : kacpid_wq;
> -		ret = queue_work(queue, &dpc->work);
> -	} else {
> -		INIT_WORK(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_hp_deferred);
> -		ret = schedule_work(&dpc->work);
> -	}
> +	/*
> +	 * We can't run hotplug code in keventd_wq/kacpid_wq/kacpid_notify_wq
> +	 * because the hotplug code may call driver .remove() functions,
> +	 * which invoke flush_scheduled_work/acpi_os_wait_events_complete
> +	 * to flush these workqueues.
> +	 */
> +	queue = hp ? kacpi_hotplug_wq :
> +		(type == OSL_NOTIFY_HANDLER ? kacpi_notify_wq : kacpid_wq);
> +	func = hp ? acpi_os_execute_hp_deferred : acpi_os_execute_deferred;
> +	INIT_WORK(&dpc->work, func);
> +	ret = queue_work(queue, &dpc->work);
>  
>  	if (!ret) {
>  		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-23 21:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-22  3:31 [PATCH 1/5] Show the physical device node of backlight class device Zhang Rui
2009-06-22  3:31 ` [PATCH 2/5] fix a deadlock in hotplug case Zhang Rui
2009-06-22  3:31   ` [PATCH 3/5] run ACPI device hot removal in kacpi_hotplug_wq Zhang Rui
2009-06-22  3:31     ` [PATCH 4/5] disable Vista compatibility on some sony laptops Zhang Rui
2009-06-22  3:31       ` [PATCH 5/5] ACPI: video: DMI workaround broken Acer 7720 BIOS enabling display brightness Zhang Rui
2009-06-24  3:41         ` Len Brown
2009-06-24  3:41       ` [PATCH 4/5] disable Vista compatibility on some sony laptops Len Brown
2009-06-24  3:41     ` [PATCH 3/5] run ACPI device hot removal in kacpi_hotplug_wq Len Brown
2009-06-22 21:54   ` [PATCH 2/5] fix a deadlock in hotplug case Bjorn Helgaas
2009-06-23  2:20     ` Zhang Rui
2009-06-23 21:59       ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2009-06-24  3:24         ` Len Brown
2009-06-24  3:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] Show the physical device node of backlight class device Len Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200906231559.37255.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --to=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox