From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: Fix regression where _PPC is not read at boot
	even when ignore_ppc=0
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:32:08 -0700
Message-ID: <20090715003207.GA5111@plum>
References: <20090428195348.GA8376@srcf.ucam.org> <20090429213930.GE6968@plum> <20090429220037.GA8604@srcf.ucam.org> <20090430072556.GD16737@elte.hu> <20090430095414.GA19462@srcf.ucam.org> <20090430111042.GA12809@elte.hu> <20090430111338.GA21297@srcf.ucam.org> <20090515191219.GH6968@plum> <20090602232108.GG7917@plum> <20090607100541.GJ31286@elte.hu>
Reply-To: djwong@us.ibm.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S932103AbZGOAeO@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090607100541.GJ31286@elte.hu>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: lenb@kernel.org, davej@redhat.com, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>, Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 12:05:41PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> I see no problems on that system here, with the patch below applied. 
> So, as i indicated above, feel free to pursue this angle, there's no 
> objection from me.

Hmm... the patch hasn't gone in to Linus' tree yet, nor has anyone else NAK'd
it.  I assume it's either Len Brown (ACPI) or Dave Jones (cpufreq) who ought to
pick it up?

--D