From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Cc: hal@lists.freedesktop.org,
Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>,
linux acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] laptop_panel.brightness_in_hardware: add all Asus laptops
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:27:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090716222703.GA24437@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A5FA837.9050300@tuffmail.co.uk>
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:22:47PM +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> I just saw the patch to generate uevents for the acpi video driver. It
> looks like it still generates KEY_BRIGHTNESSDOWN. Are you planning a
> followup patch, to suppress the input events when
> brightness_switch_enabled == 1?
I didn't want to change the behaviour of the driver with existing
userspace, but yes, I agree that that's the correct behaviour. To make
it consistent with everything else it should probably also default to
brightness_switch_enabled = 0 (and we ship it that way in Fedora), but
again, compatibility.
> Equally, w.r.t patch 3, I don't think eeepc-laptop, should generate
> brightness events on the *input* device anymore.
Right.
> The rationale is that KEY_BRIGHTNESSDOWN is a user request to increase
> brightness. In these cases, the firmware/driver has already increased
> the brightness. We've notified userspace via the backlight device. So we
> shouldn't pass the request on to userspace; it has already been acted
> upon. If we still generate KEY_BRIGHTNESS*, userspace has to guess
> whether or not the change has already been applied. If there is too much
> latency, it guesses wrong :-(.
Absolutely. The other thing that needs doing is for dell-laptop to
consume the brightness keys, or alternatively for us to remap them on
Dells. Right now (in the worst case) we're getting two sets of them.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-16 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4A49D305.1040703@tuffmail.co.uk>
[not found] ` <71cd59b00906300231yf2d3657tb5c5945f5aae0e7b@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20090708095111.GA8471@srcf.ucam.org>
[not found] ` <61b223ba0907080336i313232cco216c9c647a2e9247@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20090708104300.GA10269@srcf.ucam.org>
2009-07-16 22:22 ` [PATCH] laptop_panel.brightness_in_hardware: add all Asus laptops Alan Jenkins
2009-07-16 22:27 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090716222703.GA24437@srcf.ucam.org \
--to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
--cc=corentin.chary@gmail.com \
--cc=hal@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox