From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] acpi_power_meter: hwmon driver for ACPI 4.0 power meters Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:58:12 -0700 Message-ID: <20090803205812.GC14694@plum> References: <20090725004322.20709.96804.stgit@elm3a70.beaverton.ibm.com> <20090725004335.20709.52288.stgit@elm3a70.beaverton.ibm.com> Reply-To: djwong@us.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.152]:42461 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751688AbZHCU6c (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:58:32 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel , lm-sensors , linux-acpi , Zhang Rui On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 09:25:54PM -0400, Len Brown wrote: > Hi Darrick, > On the system you are planning to run this on... > Are the power meters in the processor, or elsewhere? > > If they are the ones in the processor, I'd rather that > Linux use a native model-specific driver to access those > registers and not use ACPI. They're not in the processor. Right now we're simulating the meters in kvm until we get real hardware, though it could be a mechanism to report per-VM power use. --D