From: Forest Bond <forest@alittletooquiet.net>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: acpi-cpufreq; Intel Johnstown (Atom N270)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:09:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090813190902.GD9385@alittletooquiet.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090813190741.GA7808@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1120 bytes --]
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 03:07:41PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 02:29:08PM -0400, Forest Bond wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 01:25:57PM -0400, Forest Bond wrote:
> > > I'm using an Intel Johnstown board with an Atom N270 processor. Performance
> > > seems to improve dramatically with acpi-cpufreq loaded. This caught me by
> > > surprise. I had assumed that without loading acpi-cpufreq the CPU would be
> > > running at its maximum speed all the time.
> >
> > I ran some tests to get some numbers. My findings indicate that before
> > acpi-cpufreq is loaded the CPU is running at 800MHz even though /proc/cpuinfo
> > indicates 1.6GHz.
>
> if no cpufreq modules have been loaded, the CPU will be running at whatever
> p-state the BIOS programmed it to start up at. In your case for some reason, that's
> the 'slow' speed.
Okay, that's what I figured.
Looks like there's some BIOS settings that may have an effect. I'll play with
those.
Thanks,
Forest
--
Forest Bond
http://www.alittletooquiet.net
http://www.pytagsfs.org
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-13 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-13 17:25 acpi-cpufreq; Intel Johnstown (Atom N270) Forest Bond
2009-08-13 18:29 ` Forest Bond
2009-08-13 19:07 ` Dave Jones
2009-08-13 19:09 ` Forest Bond [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090813190902.GD9385@alittletooquiet.net \
--to=forest@alittletooquiet.net \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox