Re: [PATCH 1/5] introduce .wakeup_event ops

[Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>]

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 09:50:46AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 05:23:16PM +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Yes, but that's fine because the PME state tells us exactly which device 
> > caused the wakeup. We'll never get a bus notification if the wakeup is 
> > triggered by UHCI on Intel.
> Hmm, but here what we are talking about is if notification is always sent to the device
> which invokes wakeup event.
> I pointed out this isn't true because BIOS might sent notification to a pci bridge and
> OS should scan devices under the bridge to check which devices invokes it by looking at
> PME state. Looks you are talking about other things.

There are two cases:

1) Notification is sent to a device. Since we know the device that 
generated the event, we don't need .wakeup_event.

2) Notification is sent to a bus. This will only happen if the device 
supports PME, so we don't need .wakeup_event.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org