From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: Is acpi_ec_ecdt_probe() broken? (was: Re: ACPI locks hardware devices when it doesn't detect vista) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:20:40 +0200 Message-ID: <200908301520.40897.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <1250945310.14167.150.camel@maxim-laptop> <1251588634.15582.0.camel@maxim-laptop> <200908300859.29494.rety@poczta.onet.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:48822 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753485AbZH3NTn (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Aug 2009 09:19:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200908300859.29494.rety@poczta.onet.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Mario Cc: Maxim Levitsky , Len Brown , linux-pm , linux-kernel , ACPI Devel Maling List , Alexey Starikovskiy On Sunday 30 August 2009, Mario wrote: > Maxim, > > I did the test regarding last coment from Alexey Starikovskiy on the bugzilla. > > >What happens if acpi_ec_ecdt_probe() is not called at all? Do you have same > >hang as with changed order? > > That did it. System starts and MIR works ok without setpci solution. Could you please put that information into the Bugzilla entry at http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14086 (you'll need to create a Bugzilla account for yourself for this purpose, sorry for the inconvenience)? The ACPI people generally use the Bugzilla rather than e-mail for tracking bugs. Best, Rafael