linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: ykzhao <yakui.zhao@intel.com>,
	"linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] PCI/ACPI PM: Propagate wake-up enable for devices w/o ACPI support
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 23:06:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090904220634.GA32278@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909050000.32288.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 12:00:32AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Yes, it's presumably the case that the PME event in the bridge is just 
> > tied to the root bridge in the chipset. Do we know what chipset this 
> > hardware is? For Intel, at least, GPE behaviour is defined in the 
> > chipset docs.
> 
> One box is Intel, the other one is based on an ATI (pre-AMD) chipset, but
> the design is similar in that respect.

GPE 0xb will be the one generated by any Intel chipset whenever the 
external PCI PME# goes active. 0xd is the equivalent for chipset-level 
devices that don't have a GPE of their own. I can't see any way that a 
downstream bridge could reasonably generate a GPE, so I'd bet that it's 
using 0xb.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-04 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-29 22:41 [PATCH] ACPI / PM: Allow PCI root bridges to wake up the system Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-31 19:41 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-31 21:24   ` [RFC][PATCH update] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-01 13:25     ` Matthew Garrett
2009-09-01 19:03       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-01 22:41         ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-03 22:02           ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] PCI/ACPI PM: Propagate wake-up enable upstream Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-03 22:03             ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] PCI PM: Simplify PCI wake-up code Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-03 22:04             ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] PCI/ACPI PM: Rework some debug messages Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-03 22:05             ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] PCI PM: Introduce device flag wakeup_prepared Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-03 22:07             ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] PCI/ACPI PM: Propagate wake-up enable for devices w/o ACPI support Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-04  2:13               ` ykzhao
2009-09-04 14:39                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-04 14:56                   ` Matthew Garrett
2009-09-04 22:00                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-04 22:06                       ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2009-09-04 22:21                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-04 22:03               ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-04 22:05                 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4 replacement] ACPI PM: Replace wakeup.prepared with reference counter Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-04 22:06                 ` [RFC][PATCH 5] PCI/ACPI PM: Propagate wake-up enable for devices w/o ACPI support Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-08 21:11             ` [PATCH 0/5 update] PCI / ACPI PM: Propagate wake-up enable upstream Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-08 21:12               ` [PATCH 1/5] PCI PM: Simplify PCI wake-up code Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-09 21:20                 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-09-08 21:13               ` [PATCH 2/5] PCI / ACPI PM: Rework some debug messages Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-08 21:14               ` [PATCH 3/5] PCI PM: Introduce device flag wakeup_prepared Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-08 21:15               ` [PATCH 4/5] ACPI PM: Replace wakeup.prepared with reference counter Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-08 21:16               ` [PATCH 5/5] PCI / ACPI PM: Propagate wake-up enable for devices w/o ACPI support Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090904220634.GA32278@srcf.ucam.org \
    --to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).