Linux ACPI
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>,
	Alan Jenkins <sourcejedi.lkml@googlemail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ACPI: Clarify resource conflict message
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:31:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909081531.46716.jdelvare@suse.de> (raw)

From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Subject: ACPI: Clarify resource conflict message

The message "ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver" is misleading. The
device _may_ need an ACPI driver, if the BIOS implemented a custom
API for the device in question (which, AFAIK, can't be checked.) If
not, then either a generic ACPI driver may be used (for example
"thermal"), or nothing can be done (other than a white list).

I propose to reword the message to:

ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you should use
it instead of the native driver

which I think is more correct. Comments and suggestions welcome.

I also added a message warning about possible problems and system
instability when users pass acpi_enforce_resources=lax, as suggested
by Len.

Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Cc: Alan Jenkins <sourcejedi.lkml@googlemail.com>
---
Len, if you are satisfied with the wording, any chance to have this
patch in 2.6.31? Thanks.

 drivers/acpi/osl.c |    8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-2.6.31-rc9.orig/drivers/acpi/osl.c	2009-09-08 09:46:51.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.31-rc9/drivers/acpi/osl.c	2009-09-08 13:56:53.000000000 +0200
@@ -1182,7 +1182,13 @@ int acpi_check_resource_conflict(struct
 			       res_list_elem->name,
 			       (long long) res_list_elem->start,
 			       (long long) res_list_elem->end);
-			printk(KERN_INFO "ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver\n");
+			if (acpi_enforce_resources == ENFORCE_RESOURCES_LAX)
+				printk(KERN_NOTICE "ACPI: This conflict may"
+				       " cause random problems and system"
+				       " instability\n");
+			printk(KERN_INFO "ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available"
+			       " for this device, you should use it instead of"
+			       " the native driver\n");
 		}
 		if (acpi_enforce_resources == ENFORCE_RESOURCES_STRICT)
 			return -EBUSY;

-- 
Jean Delvare
Suse L3

             reply	other threads:[~2009-09-08 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-08 13:31 Jean Delvare [this message]
2009-09-21  8:25 ` [PATCH v2] ACPI: Clarify resource conflict message Jean Delvare
2009-09-27  7:12 ` Len Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200909081531.46716.jdelvare@suse.de \
    --to=jdelvare@suse.de \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=sourcejedi.lkml@googlemail.com \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox