From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] PM: Add a switch for disabling/enabling asynchronous suspend/resume Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:56:39 +0200 Message-ID: <200909102056.39903.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200909100127.11252.rjw@sisk.pl> <200909100138.25839.rjw@sisk.pl> <20090910102653.GA30778@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090910102653.GA30778@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-pm , LKML , Linux PCI , ACPI Devel Maling List , Len Brown , Zhang Rui , Alan Stern , Arjan van de Ven , Ingo Molnar List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 10 September 2009, Pavel Machek wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > Add sysfs attribute kernel/power/pm_async allowing the user space to > > disable and enable async suspend/resume of devices. > > for bisect reasons, should this go before 5? It is set to "enabled" by default, so it shouldn't change bisection results. Thanks, Rafael