From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] PM: Add a switch for disabling/enabling asynchronous suspend/resume Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:15:23 +0200 Message-ID: <200909102215.23403.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200909100127.11252.rjw@sisk.pl> <200909102056.39903.rjw@sisk.pl> <20090910185901.GB23356@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:40424 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753108AbZIJUO2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:14:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090910185901.GB23356@elf.ucw.cz> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-pm , LKML , Linux PCI , ACPI Devel Maling List , Len Brown , Zhang Rui , Alan Stern , Arjan van de Ven , Ingo Molnar On Thursday 10 September 2009, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Thu 2009-09-10 20:56:39, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday 10 September 2009, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > > > > > Add sysfs attribute kernel/power/pm_async allowing the user space to > > > > disable and enable async suspend/resume of devices. > > > > > > for bisect reasons, should this go before 5? > > > > It is set to "enabled" by default, so it shouldn't change bisection results. > > Well, 5 enables it, 6 makes it configurable. So if you need async > disabled for a bisect, hitting commit between 5 and 6 will enable it > for you... OK, I'll move the patch before the [4/9]. Thanks, Rafael