public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] rfkill_unregister() should always be followed by rfkill_destroy()
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:47:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909141947.22170.corentincj@iksaif.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090914171056.GB13452@khazad-dum.debian.net>

On Monday 14 September 2009 19:10:56 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > I don't know about the fix for dell-laptop since it is a lot larger.
> 
> But looking at it, it seems to meet the -stable criteria as well.  However,
> it looks like you're fixing two bugs there (set pointers to NULL, call
> _destroy()), so it would be better to have two (smaller) patches, maybe?
> 

The dell-laptop patch is superseded by:
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/42705/
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/42699/

I didn't check patchwork before working on this patch :/

-- 
Corentin Chary
http://xf.iksaif.net

      reply	other threads:[~2009-09-14 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-14 10:43 [PATCH 0/3] rfkill_unregister() should always be followed by rfkill_destroy() Corentin Chary
2009-09-14 10:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] hp-wmi: fix rfkill memory leak on unload Corentin Chary
2009-09-14 10:43   ` [PATCH 2/3] thinkpad_acpi: " Corentin Chary
2009-09-14 10:43     ` [PATCH 3/3] dell-laptop: " Corentin Chary
2009-09-14 10:46       ` Matthew Garrett
2009-09-14 11:02         ` Alan Jenkins
2009-09-14 12:01           ` Corentin Chary
2009-09-14 13:22     ` [PATCH 2/3] thinkpad_acpi: " Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-09-19  5:10     ` Len Brown
2009-09-14 10:59   ` [PATCH 1/3] hp-wmi: " Matthew Garrett
2009-09-19  5:13     ` Len Brown
2009-09-14 13:24 ` [PATCH 0/3] rfkill_unregister() should always be followed by rfkill_destroy() Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-09-14 14:57   ` Alan Jenkins
     [not found]     ` <20090914170717.GA13452@khazad-dum.debian.net>
2009-09-14 17:10       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-09-14 17:47         ` Corentin Chary [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200909141947.22170.corentincj@iksaif.net \
    --to=corentincj@iksaif.net \
    --cc=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=julia@diku.dk \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox