public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Joel Schopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v6 PATCH 0/7]: cpuidle/x86/POWER: Cleanup idle power management code in x86, cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c and introduce cpuidle to POWER.
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:35:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090925113556.4e1b1c4a@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1253868864.10287.3.camel@twins>

On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:54:24 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:

> On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 12:36 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> > * Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> [2009-09-24 14:22:28]:
> > 
> > > On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:42:41 +0530
> > > Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > * Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2009-09-22
> > > > 16:55:27]:
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Len, (or other acpi folks),
> > > > 
> > > > I had a question regarding ACPI-cpuidle interaction in the
> > > > current implementation.
> > > > 
> > > > Currently, every cpu (i.e. acpi_processor) registers to cpuidle
> > > > as a cpuidle_device. So every cpu has to go through the process
> > > > of setting up the idle states and then registering as a cpuidle
> > > > device.
> > > > 
> > > > What exactly is the reason behind this?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > technically a BIOS can opt to give you C states via ACPI on some
> > > cpus, but not on others.
> > > 
> > > in practice when this happens it tends to be a bug.. but it's
> > > technically a valid configuration
> > 
> > So we will need to keep the per-cpu registration as of now because
> > we may have such buggy BIOS in the field and we don't want the
> > cpuidle framework to malfunction there.
> 
> If the BIOS doesn't mention a certain C state on a cpu, and you try to
> set it anyway, does that go boom?
> 
> This whole per-cpu registration thing is horridly ugly, can't you
> have a per-cpu C state exception mask and leave it at that -- if its
> really needed?

the real solution is to make the acpi code always know about C1, even
if the bios doesn't.... That's one for Len :)

(C1 is just "hlt", what we do in the other idle loop ;-) 


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-25  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20090922112526.GA7788@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-09-24  5:12 ` [v6 PATCH 0/7]: cpuidle/x86/POWER: Cleanup idle power management code in x86, cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c and introduce cpuidle to POWER Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-09-24 12:22   ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-25  7:06     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-09-25  8:54       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-25  9:35         ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2009-09-25  7:20     ` Balbir Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090925113556.4e1b1c4a@infradead.org \
    --to=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=jschopp@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox