From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: increase alignment to make more space for hidden code Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:22:42 +0200 Message-ID: <20091012192242.GA2691@elte.hu> References: <200908072333.24631.storm@sys49152.net> <4ACAC8F1.1050706@kernel.org> <4AD24B5C.4050905@kernel.org> <200910121059.10366.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <4AD37CA4.90601@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:46990 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756811AbZJLTYH (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:24:07 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AD37CA4.90601@kernel.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Len Brown , Linus Torvalds , Jesse Barnes , Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Yannick Roehlly , Ivan Kokshaysky , x86@kernel.org * Yinghai Lu wrote: > > This feels like a hack that accidentally covers up the problem. I > > don't think we understand what's happening well enough. > > yes, we need to figure out why when acpi=on, those BAR are cleared, > before pci code try to scan and read BAR. (node early pic print out > untouched, but after APCI subsystem is enabled, those BAR got > clearred) I'm wondering, how did it get cleared - some AML script told the kernel to clear it? Ingo