From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [patch] x86: reduce srat verbosity in the kernel log Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:32:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20091028033219.GE7744@basil.fritz.box> References: <20091023233743.439628000@alcatraz.americas.sgi.com> <20091023233750.702443000@alcatraz.americas.sgi.com> <87pr8ay6tc.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <4AE710C9.2070307@sgi.com> <4AE75162.7080903@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:48901 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757205AbZJ1DcP (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:32:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: David Rientjes Cc: Ingo Molnar , Mike Travis , Andi Kleen , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Jack Steiner , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, Yinghai Lu , Mel Gorman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > +static DECLARE_BITMAP(apicid_map, MAX_LOCAL_APIC) __initdata; > +static char apicid_list[MAX_LOCAL_APIC] __initdata; Is MAX_LOCAL_APIC really big enough to print them all in ASCII? It would be better to not use that large a buffer, but print in smaller pieces (I realize this would enlarge your patch, but then it would also save a lot of BSS) -Andi