From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Sujith Thomas <sujith.thomas@intel.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] [resend] thermal: improvements re. forced passive cooling
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:35:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091028153551.6c665ca1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1256542744-26569-1-git-send-email-elendil@planet.nl>
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:38:58 +0100
Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> wrote:
>
> Please consider this patch set for 2.6.32. It was previously submitted
> for 2.6.31, but AFAICT it has not yet been picked up.
>
> All patches have been acked by either Rui or Matthew, with the
> exception of 1/6 and 4/6, but the entire series has been implicitly
> acked by Rui in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13918#c26.
>
> The patch set closes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13918.
>
> Andrew, could you take the set just in case?
>
I'm trying to work out what the actual bug is in here.
afacit some KDE tool put wrong numbers into /proc files, acpi didn't
sanity check them sufficiently and permitted the CPU to overheat, yes?
There seems to be rather a lot of non-bugfix stuff in this patch
series. Perhaps too much for 2.6.32, and a real problem if we want to
backport something into 2.6.31.x and earlier.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-28 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-26 7:38 [PATCH 0/6] [resend] thermal: improvements re. forced passive cooling Frans Pop
2009-10-26 7:38 ` [PATCH 1/6] thermal: sysfs-api.txt - reformat for improved readability Frans Pop
2009-11-05 23:11 ` Len Brown
2009-10-26 7:39 ` [PATCH 2/6] thermal: sysfs-api.txt - document passive attribute for thermal zones Frans Pop
2009-11-05 23:11 ` Len Brown
2009-10-26 7:39 ` [PATCH 3/6] acpi: thermal: display forced passive trip points in proc Frans Pop
2009-11-05 23:12 ` Len Brown
2009-10-26 7:39 ` [PATCH 4/6] thermal: add sanity check for the passive attribute Frans Pop
2009-10-26 7:39 ` [PATCH 5/6] thermal: Only set passive_delay for forced_passive cooling Frans Pop
2009-10-26 7:39 ` [PATCH 6/6] thermal: disable polling if passive_delay and polling_delay are both unset Frans Pop
2009-10-28 22:35 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-10-28 22:49 ` [PATCH 0/6] [resend] thermal: improvements re. forced passive cooling Frans Pop
2009-11-05 23:26 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091028153551.6c665ca1.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=sujith.thomas@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox