From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make sure wakeup code is below 1M -v2 Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:12:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20091113081205.GC18054@elte.hu> References: <4AF7D820.5040503@kernel.org> <4AFA210B.3020207@kernel.org> <20091112073616.GA11365@elf.ucw.cz> <200911122032.46872.rjw@sisk.pl> <20091113073608.GB26127@elte.hu> <4AFD12F2.2090103@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:37416 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754665AbZKMIM0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:12:26 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AFD12F2.2090103@zytor.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pavel Machek , Yinghai Lu , Thomas Gleixner , Len Brown , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , ACPI Devel Maling List , pm list * H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 11/12/2009 11:36 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > Physical constraints to allocations (which this is) should be expressed > > early and with high priority, to make sure they can be met. > > > > Indeed, and in this case this means before bootmem allocator initialization. The other advantage of Yinghai's patch is that it removes a bootmem usage from x86, which moves us a bit forward on the road to remove the bootmem allocator altogether and go from early allocators to slab straight away. Ingo