From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
lenb@kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2]ACPI: assign different lockdep key for acpi works
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:57:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091211135716.b6d577a1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091211030458.GB7772@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:04:58 +0800
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> wrote:
> Differentiate works for three different workqueue in ACPI. This fixes
> a fase alarm from lockdep, as acpi hotplug workqueue waits other
> workqueues.
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14553
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/osl.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/osl.c 2009-12-10 10:40:15.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux/drivers/acpi/osl.c 2009-12-10 10:43:25.000000000 +0800
> @@ -729,6 +729,8 @@ static acpi_status __acpi_os_execute(acp
> struct acpi_os_dpc *dpc;
> struct workqueue_struct *queue;
> int ret;
> + static struct lock_class_key hp_key, notify_key, acpid_key;
> +
> ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_EXEC,
> "Scheduling function [%p(%p)] for deferred execution.\n",
> function, context));
> @@ -758,7 +760,15 @@ static acpi_status __acpi_os_execute(acp
> queue = hp ? kacpi_hotplug_wq :
> (type == OSL_NOTIFY_HANDLER ? kacpi_notify_wq : kacpid_wq);
> dpc->wait = hp ? 1 : 0;
> - INIT_WORK(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_deferred);
> + if (queue == kacpi_hotplug_wq)
> + INIT_WORK_KEY(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_deferred,
> + hp_key, "acpi_hp_work");
> + else if (queue == kacpi_notify_wq)
> + INIT_WORK_KEY(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_deferred,
> + notify_key, "acpi_notify_work");
> + else
> + INIT_WORK_KEY(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_deferred,
> + acpid_key, "acpi_acpid_work");
> ret = queue_work(queue, &dpc->work);
>
> if (!ret) {
Yes, that's a shortcoming in the present INIT_WORK(). However I think
you can solve this more simply, without introducing INIT_WORK_KEY():
if (queue == kacpi_hotplug_wq)
INIT_WORK(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_deferred);
else if (queue == kacpi_notify_wq)
INIT_WORK(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_deferred);
else
INIT_WORK(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_deferred);
it looks silly, but I think the compiler will do the right thing with it
- you'll get a separate lock_class_key at each site.
Obviously it would need an explanatory comment.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-11 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-11 3:04 [PATCH 2/2]ACPI: assign different lockdep key for acpi works Shaohua Li
2009-12-11 21:57 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-12-14 1:08 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091211135716.b6d577a1.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox