From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Youquan,Song" Subject: Re: [PATCH]acpi c-states: Fix ACPI C3 is wrongly mapped to C2 Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:12:55 -0500 Message-ID: <20091214131255.GA4126@youquan-linux.bj.intel.com> References: <20091212181442.GA22832@youquan-linux.bj.intel.com> <20091212142727.GA6867@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> <20091212235549.GA7753@youquan-linux.bj.intel.com> <20091213084317.GA15989@isilmar.linta.de> <20091214100200.GA17243@youquan-linux.bj.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga12.intel.com ([143.182.124.36]:11753 "EHLO azsmga102.ch.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750878AbZLNFh0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:37:26 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091214100200.GA17243@youquan-linux.bj.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: Dominik Brodowski , lenb@kernel.org, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, kent.liu@intel.com, chaohong.guo@intel.com, youquan.song@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > > Yes, but what happens if there are two states of type C2? The whole concept > > of "type C" and "state C" was broken from the beginning... > > Sorry. In my mind, there is no two states of ACPI C2. If processor C3 > above are mapped to ACPI C3, so processor C1 is mapped to ACPI C1, > processor C2 is mapped to ACPI C2. > Len Brown, Am I right? > > If I am wrong, I will file another patches for it. This patch handle the ACPI C2 invlidation on some platform. Another patch "acpi c-states: Fix multiply C-states name disturbance" will unify multiply C-states name. -Youquan