From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Async suspend-resume patch w/ completions (was: Re: Async suspend-resume patch w/ rwsems)
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:03:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200912151203.22916.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0912141609020.14385@localhost.localdomain>
On Tuesday 15 December 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Because the PCI bridges are not the only case where it matters (I'd say they
> > are really a corner case). Basically, any two async devices separeted by a
> > series of sync ones are likely not to be suspended (or resumed) in parallel
> > with each other, because the parent is usually next to its children in dpm_list.
>
> Give a real example that matters.
I'll try. Let -> denote child-parent relationships and assume dpm_list looks
like this:
..., A->B->C, D, E->F->G, ...
where A, B, E, F are all async and C, D, G are sync (E, F, G may be USB and
A, B, C may be serio input devices and D is a device that just happens to be in
dpm_list between them). Say A and C take the majority of the total suspend
time and assume we traverse the dpm_list from left to right.
Now, during suspend, C waits for B that waits for A and G waits for F that
waits for E. Moreover, since C is sync, the PM core won't start the suspend
of D until the suspend of C has returned. In turn, since D is sync, the
suspend of E won't be started until the suspend of D has returned. So in
this situation the gain from the async suspends of A, B, E, F is zero.
However, it won't be zero if we start the async suspends of A, B, E, F
upfront.
I'm not sure if this is sufficiently "real life" for you, but this is how
dpm_list looks on one of my test boxes, more or less.
> Really.
>
> How hard can it be to understand: KISS. Keep It Simple, Stupid.
>
> I get really tired of this whole stupid async discussion, because you're
> overdesigning it.
>
> To a first approximation, THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS IS USB.
If this applies to _resume_ only, then I agree, but the Arjan's data clearly
show that serio devices take much more time to suspend than USB.
But if we only talk about resume, the PCI bridges don't really matter,
because they are resumed before all devices that depend on them, so they don't
really need to wait for anyone anyway.
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-15 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 234+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-05 21:16 [GIT PULL] PM updates for 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-05 21:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-05 21:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-05 23:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-06 0:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-06 1:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-06 1:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-06 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-06 0:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-06 1:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-06 1:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-06 2:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-06 2:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-06 15:23 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-06 19:04 ` [linux-pm] " Victor Lowther
2009-12-07 3:57 ` Zhang Rui
2009-12-07 5:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-07 6:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-17 23:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-12-07 6:37 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-07 15:13 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-07 16:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-07 16:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-07 17:52 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-07 18:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-07 20:37 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-07 20:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-07 21:32 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-07 21:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-07 21:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-07 22:01 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-07 22:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-07 22:21 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-07 22:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-07 23:16 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-07 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-07 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-07 23:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-08 3:27 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-08 12:23 ` Async resume patch (was: Re: [GIT PULL] PM updates for 2.6.33) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-08 12:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-08 15:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-08 15:55 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-08 16:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-08 18:08 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-08 18:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-08 18:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-08 19:34 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-08 19:30 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-08 20:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-08 21:32 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-08 21:52 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-12-08 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-09 19:06 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-09 21:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-08 19:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-08 20:16 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-08 20:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-08 20:44 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-08 20:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-08 21:40 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-08 21:48 ` spinlock in completion_done() (was: Re: Async resume patch (was: Re: [GIT PULL] PM updates for 2.6.33)) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-09 9:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-09 22:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-10 7:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-11 4:10 ` Dave Chinner
2009-12-11 7:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-12 23:07 ` [PATCH] sched: Make wakeup side variants of completion API irq safe (was: Re: spinlock in completion_done()) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-08 22:18 ` Async resume patch (was: Re: [GIT PULL] PM updates for 2.6.33) Linus Torvalds
2009-12-09 2:11 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-08 21:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-08 21:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-08 22:07 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-08 22:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-09 2:23 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-09 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-09 22:27 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-08 22:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-09 2:35 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-09 2:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-09 15:24 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-09 15:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-09 15:57 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-25 17:09 ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-09 13:38 ` Mark Brown
2009-12-09 15:49 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-09 16:02 ` Mark Brown
2009-12-09 16:23 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-09 16:46 ` Mark Brown
2009-12-09 16:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-09 17:45 ` Mark Brown
2009-12-09 17:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-09 18:27 ` Mark Brown
2009-12-09 17:10 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-09 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-09 18:08 ` Mark Brown
2009-12-08 21:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-08 21:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-08 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-08 22:55 ` Async suspend-resume patch w/ rwsems " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-08 23:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-09 20:15 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-09 22:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-09 22:38 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-09 23:18 ` Async suspend-resume patch w/ completions (was: Re: Async suspend-resume patch w/ rwsems) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-10 2:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-10 19:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-10 23:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-11 1:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-11 1:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-11 3:42 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-11 22:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-12 0:38 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-11 22:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-11 22:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-11 23:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-11 23:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-12 17:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-12 18:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-12 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-12 22:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-14 18:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-14 22:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-14 22:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-14 22:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-14 23:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-15 0:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-15 0:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-15 11:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-15 15:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-15 11:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2009-12-15 15:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-15 15:55 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-15 16:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-15 18:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-15 20:26 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-15 21:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-15 22:01 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-15 21:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-15 22:27 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-16 2:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-16 6:40 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-12-18 22:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-19 19:59 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-12-19 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-19 22:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-19 22:43 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-12-19 22:47 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-12-19 23:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-19 23:22 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-12-19 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-19 23:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-19 23:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-19 23:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-19 23:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-19 23:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-19 23:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-20 0:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-20 0:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-20 2:41 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-12-20 19:25 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-21 7:39 ` [linux-pm] Async suspend-resume patch w/ completions (was: Re: Async?suspend-resume " Dmitry Torokhov
2009-12-21 11:20 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2009-12-20 2:45 ` Async suspend-resume patch w/ completions (was: Re: Async suspend-resume " Dmitry Torokhov
2009-12-20 3:59 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-20 12:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-20 17:12 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-20 18:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-20 19:38 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-20 19:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-16 15:22 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-16 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-16 15:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-16 19:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-16 20:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-16 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-16 22:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-16 22:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-16 23:04 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-16 23:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-17 1:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-17 1:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-17 20:06 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-17 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-18 1:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-18 17:26 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-19 21:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-20 3:48 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-20 12:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-18 23:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-13 13:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-13 17:30 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-13 19:02 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2009-12-12 0:43 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-12 17:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-10 15:31 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-10 15:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-10 18:37 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-10 23:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-10 21:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-10 22:17 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-10 23:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-07 15:15 ` [GIT PULL] PM updates for 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-07 16:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-07 20:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-07 20:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-07 5:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-07 15:42 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-06 19:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-06 19:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-06 20:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-06 21:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-06 22:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-12-07 0:55 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-07 2:27 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-12-07 5:26 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-07 6:00 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-12-21 9:01 ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-07 1:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-07 2:27 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-12-07 5:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-07 6:15 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-12-07 6:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-07 6:32 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-12-07 15:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-06 20:36 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-06 21:17 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-06 21:46 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-06 21:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-06 22:04 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-06 0:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-06 0:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-06 1:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-06 1:50 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200912151203.22916.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox