From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/12] PCI / PM: Propagate wake-up enable for PCIe devices too Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:28:21 +0100 Message-ID: <200912162028.21775.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200911160047.46299.rjw@sisk.pl> <200911291635.54352.rjw@sisk.pl> <20091216111939.1a756377@jbarnes-piketon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20091216111939.1a756377@jbarnes-piketon> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jesse Barnes Cc: pm list , LKML , Linux PCI , ACPI Devel Maling List , Alan Stern , Matthew Garrett , Oliver Neukum , Shaohua Li , Bjorn Helgaas , Francois Romieu , Len Brown List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 16 December 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:35:54 +0100 > "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > Having read the PM part of the PCIe 2.0 specification more carefully > > I think that it was a mistake to restrict the wake-up enable > > propagation to non-PCIe devices, because if we do not request > > control of the root ports' PME registers via OSC, PCIe PME is > > supposed to be handled by the platform, just like the non-PCIe PME. > > Even if we do that, the wake-up propagation is done to allow the > > devices to wake up the system from sleep states which involves the > > platform anyway, so it won't hurt. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > --- > > drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 10 ++-------- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > Applied after fixing up conflicts related to dev->is_pcie. Thanks!