From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: Async suspend-resume patch w/ completions (was: Re: Async suspend-resume patch w/ rwsems) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:33:57 +0100 Message-ID: <200912162333.57245.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200912162257.00771.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:59427 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935250AbZLPWdc (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:33:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Alan Stern , Zhang Rui , LKML , ACPI Devel Maling List , pm list On Wednesday 16 December 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Btw, what are the timings if you just force everything async? I think that > worked on yur laptops, no? No, it didn't. I could make all PCI async, provided that the ACPI subtree was resumed before any PCI devices. [Theoretically I can make that happen by moving ACPI resume to the _noirq phase (just for testing of course). So I can try to make PCI async in addition to serio and USB, plus i8042 perhaps, which should be sfficient for the nx6325 I think.] Making all async always hanged the boxes on resume. Rafael