From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Youquan,Song" Subject: Re: [PATCH]acpi c-states: Fix ACPI C3 is wrongly mapped to C2 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:19:26 -0500 Message-ID: <20091217111926.GA11466@youquan-linux.bj.intel.com> References: <20091212181442.GA22832@youquan-linux.bj.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga10.intel.com ([192.55.52.92]:38782 "EHLO fmsmga102.fm.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758333AbZLQDoC (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:44:02 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: "Youquan,Song" , venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, kent.liu@intel.com, chaohong.guo@intel.com, youquan.song@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > I believe that powertop is bugged in how it reverse-engineers > the C-state names and displays hardware names. I think that > we should put the hardware names in /sysfs and it should > simply use them -- but more on that later. Hi Len Brown, I got it. Thanks for your explanation. So, Can I consider that you have agreed with the patch [Resend PATCH] acpi c-states: Fix multiply C-states name disturbance? BTW:I also have interest to make powertop keep compatible with this change if it is needed. Thanks. -Youquan