Re: Async suspend-resume patch w/ completions (was: Re: Async suspend-resume patch w/ rwsems)

Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-20T00:34:48Z

On Sunday 20 December 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > Why would it be?
> >
> > The embedded controller may depend on it.
>
> Again, I say "why?"
>
> Anything can be true. That doesn't _make_ everything true. There's no real
> reason why PnP/ACPI suspend/resume should really care.
>
> We can try it. Not for 2.6.33, but by the 34 merge window maybe we'll have
> a patch-series that is ready to be tested, and that aggressively tries to
> do the devices that matter asynchronously.

Yes, I'd like to have such a patch series for 2.6.34.

So far I've been able to confirm that doing serio+i8042, USB and ACPI battery
asynchronously may give us significant time savings, especially during resume.

> So instead of you trying to make up some idiotic cross-device worries,
> just see if those worries have any actual background in reality. So far I
> haven't actually heard anything but "in theory, anything is possible",
> which is such a truism that it's not even worth voicing.
>
> That said, I still get the feeling that we'd be even better off simply
> trying to avoid the whole keyboard reset entirely. Apparently we do it for
> a few HP laptops. It's entirely possible that we'd be better off simply
> not _doing_ the slow thing in the first place.

That very well may be the case, but I'm not the right person to confirm or deny
that.

Rafael