From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] Asynchronous suspend/resume - test results
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:10:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200912242310.42615.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B32D2D6.3030707@crca.org.au>
On Thursday 24 December 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
Hi,
> I built the async branch of your tree and tested it, also running
> 2.6.33-rc1 + TuxOnIce for comparison. Dmesg for both are attached. Is
> there anything I can/should be doing for you on top of this?
No, thanks a lot.
> I'll try Dmitry's patch on top of this a little later - other things to do first.
No need for that, the patchset contains an equivalent of the Dmitry's patch.
> I noticed that you were doing standard deviations in your stats - how
> many runs were you basing them on?
I usually run 10 iterations of suspend-resume for each configuration.
The raw data are at http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/data/async-suspend-updated.pdf
if you're interested.
> Not sure that I can be bothered to do too many - too much else to do!
Sure, thanks a lot anyway. Your data confirn that there's a measurable gain
from suspending and resuming devices asynchronously.
Have a merry Christmas and happy new year,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-24 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-21 0:40 [RFC] Asynchronous suspend/resume - test results Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-21 7:25 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2009-12-21 7:35 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-12-21 19:58 ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-12-21 20:04 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-12-23 20:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-24 2:32 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-12-24 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2009-12-25 20:57 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2009-12-26 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-26 22:03 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-12-27 14:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-21 20:10 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-21 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-21 20:54 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-21 23:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-23 20:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-02 21:28 ` [Update] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-04 17:17 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200912242310.42615.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ncunningham@crca.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox