From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 12/12] PM / r8169: Add simplified run-time PM support Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 20:51:08 +0100 Message-ID: <201001042051.08692.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200911160047.46299.rjw@sisk.pl> <201001032201.14087.rjw@sisk.pl> <20100104083108.GD1372@ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100104083108.GD1372@ucw.cz> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: pm list , LKML , Linux PCI , ACPI Devel Maling List , Alan Stern , Jesse Barnes , Matthew Garrett , Oliver Neukum , Shaohua Li , Bjorn Helgaas , Francois Romieu , Len Brown List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Monday 04 January 2010, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > Using /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/state I measured the energy drawn in 10 minutes > > > > both with the network adapter in D0 and D3hot. The results were that with the > > > > network adapter in D0 the box drew 2476 mWh, while with the network adapter in > > > > D3hot it drew 2361 mWh. The difference is 115 mWh, or about 5% on this > > > > particular box. > > > > > > > > This means about 0.1 Wh in 10 minutes, so we can save about 0.6 Wh per hour. > > > > > > Which means it saves 0.6W :-). Measuring power in Wh/h is "interesting". > > > > You can't save power, you can only save energy. Wh is just an energy unit. > > Of course we can save power, you just did :-). > > (And in some cases -- data centers, limited cooling -- you are limited > by power, not energy. But still energy is what you pay for, isn't it? > You are right that on notebooks, energy is more important.) You may require less power to run, so if that's what you mean by "saving", then I agree. :-) Rafael