From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: sboyce@blueyonder.co.uk
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #14946] All kernels after 2.6.32-git10 show only 1 CPU
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:04:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201001112104.54141.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B4A9D8F.9030300@blueyonder.co.uk>
On Monday 11 January 2010, Sid Boyce wrote:
> On 10/01/10 22:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14946
> > Subject : All kernels after 2.6.32-git10 show only 1 CPU
> > Submitter : Sid Boyce <sboyce@blueyonder.co.uk>
> > Date : 2009-12-23 16:55 (19 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126158734326801&w=4
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> With 2.6.33-rc3-git3 I now see 2 CPU's every on a normal boot, but its
> locking up solid at this part of the boot process as usual.
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [AAZA] enabled at IRQ 22
> HDA Intel 0000:00:0e.1: PCI INT B -> Link[AAZA] -> GSI 22 (level, low)
> -> IRQ 22.
> With acpi=noirq (2 CPU's)
> ================
> kvm: Nested Virtualization enabled.
> IT8716 Super IO detected
> Parport_PC 00:0a: reported by plug and Play ACPI
> Parport 0: PC-Style at 0x378, irq 7 [PCSPP, TRISTATE,EPP]
> parport: irq 7 in use, resorting to polled operation
> HDA Intel 0000:00:0e.1: PCI -> APIC IRQ transform: INT B -> IRQ 11
>
> With acpi=ht (1 CPU)
> =============
> Hangs at:-
> Loading drivees, configuring devices do_IRQ: 0.65 No irq handler for
> vector (irq -1)
>
> With acpi=off (2 CPU's)
> ========================
> Hangs at same point as with acpi=noirq.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-11 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-10 22:27 2.6.33-rc3-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-11 16:00 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
[not found] ` <omZ8aBZReyD.A.jbH.QNlSLB@chimera>
[not found] ` <4B4A9D8F.9030300@blueyonder.co.uk>
2010-01-11 20:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-01-11 21:47 ` Nick Bowler
2010-01-11 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201001112104.54141.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyce@blueyonder.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox