From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
To: lenb@kernel.org
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/12] ACPI: processor: add internal processor_physically_present()
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:41:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100125214103.28510.69941.stgit@bob.kio> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100125213221.28510.74078.stgit@bob.kio>
Detect if a processor is physically present before evaluating _PDC.
We want this because some BIOS will provide a _PDC even for processors
that are not present. These bogus _PDC methods then attempt to load
non-existent tables, which causes problems.
Avoid those bogus landmines.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
index ca12d70..e8b1246 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
@@ -194,6 +194,45 @@ int acpi_get_cpuid(acpi_handle handle, int type, u32 acpi_id)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_get_cpuid);
#endif
+static bool processor_physically_present(acpi_handle handle)
+{
+ int cpuid, type;
+ u32 acpi_id;
+ acpi_status status;
+ acpi_object_type acpi_type;
+ unsigned long long tmp;
+ union acpi_object object = { 0 };
+ struct acpi_buffer buffer = { sizeof(union acpi_object), &object };
+
+ status = acpi_get_type(handle, &acpi_type);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+ return false;
+
+ switch (acpi_type) {
+ case ACPI_TYPE_PROCESSOR:
+ status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, NULL, NULL, &buffer);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+ return false;
+ acpi_id = object.processor.proc_id;
+ break;
+ case ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE:
+ status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_UID", NULL, &tmp);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+ return false;
+ acpi_id = tmp;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ type = (acpi_type == ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE) ? 1 : 0;
+ cpuid = acpi_get_cpuid(handle, type, acpi_id);
+
+ if (cpuid == -1)
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
static void acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
{
@@ -335,6 +374,9 @@ static struct dmi_system_id __cpuinitdata early_pdc_optin_table[] = {
static acpi_status
early_init_pdc(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
{
+ if (processor_physically_present(handle) == false)
+ return AE_OK;
+
acpi_processor_set_pdc(handle);
return AE_OK;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-25 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-25 21:40 [PATCH 00/12] ACPI: processor driver vs. core Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:40 ` [PATCH 01/12] ACPI: processor: mv processor_core.c processor_driver.c Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:40 ` [PATCH 02/12] ACPI: processor: mv processor_pdc.c processor_core.c Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:40 ` [PATCH 03/12] ACPI: processor: export acpi_get_cpuid() Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:40 ` [PATCH 04/12] ACPI: processor: move acpi_get_cpuid into processor_core.c Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:41 ` Alex Chiang [this message]
2010-01-25 21:41 ` [PATCH 06/12] ACPI: processor: remove early _PDC optin quirks Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:41 ` [PATCH 07/12] ACPI: processor: driver doesn't need to evaluate _PDC Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:41 ` [PATCH 08/12] ACPI: processor: refactor internal map_lapic_id() Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:41 ` [PATCH 09/12] ACPI: processor: refactor internal map_x2apic_id() Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:41 ` [PATCH 10/12] ACPI: processor: refactor internal map_lsapic_id() Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 22:22 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-25 22:46 ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:41 ` [PATCH 11/12] ACPI: processor: push file static MADT pointer into internal map_madt_entry() Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:41 ` [PATCH 12/12] ACPI: processor core: style and sparse cleanups Alex Chiang
2010-02-02 23:17 ` [PATCH 00/12] ACPI: processor driver vs. core Alex Chiang
2010-02-03 1:51 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100125214103.28510.69941.stgit@bob.kio \
--to=achiang@hp.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox