public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
To: lenb@kernel.org, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] ACPI: processor driver vs. core
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:17:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100202231710.GA24718@ldl.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100125213221.28510.74078.stgit@bob.kio>

Hi Venki,

Do you have any opinions on this patchset? If so, I'd like to
address them.

Thanks,
/ac

* Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>:
> This series cleans up some of the mess I made when introducing
> early _PDC.
> 
> The major change is renaming processor_core.c to processor_driver.c,
> and then renaming processor_pdc.c to processor_core.c.
> 
> The idea is that the code in processor_core.c will always be built
> statically into the kernel (as long as ACPI is configured), while
> allowing the ACPI processor driver to remain modular (if so desired).
> 
> We do this because part of the cleanups involves teaching the
> early _PDC evaluation code how to determine if a processor is
> physically present or not -- aka enumeration -- and that sort
> of code doesn't really belong in a file named processor_pdc.
> 
> There are quite a few checkpatch errors in the first rename patch,
> and I'll look at cleaning those up in a later series.
> 
> /ac
> 
> ---
> 
> Alex Chiang (12):
>       ACPI: processor: mv processor_core.c processor_driver.c
>       ACPI: processor: mv processor_pdc.c processor_core.c
>       ACPI: processor: export acpi_get_cpuid()
>       ACPI: processor: move acpi_get_cpuid into processor_core.c
>       ACPI: processor: add internal processor_physically_present()
>       ACPI: processor: remove early _PDC optin quirks
>       ACPI: processor: driver doesn't need to evaluate _PDC
>       ACPI: processor: refactor internal map_lapic_id()
>       ACPI: processor: refactor internal map_x2apic_id()
>       ACPI: processor: refactor internal map_lsapic_id()
>       ACPI: processor: push file static MADT pointer into internal map_madt_entry()
>       ACPI: processor core: style and sparse cleanups
> 
> 
>  Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |    4 
>  arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c             |    3 
>  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c         |    3 
>  drivers/acpi/Makefile               |    4 
>  drivers/acpi/processor_core.c       | 1149 +++++------------------------------
>  drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c     |  976 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c        |  209 ------
>  include/acpi/processor.h            |   10 
>  8 files changed, 1172 insertions(+), 1186 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
>  delete mode 100644 drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-02 23:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-25 21:40 [PATCH 00/12] ACPI: processor driver vs. core Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:40 ` [PATCH 01/12] ACPI: processor: mv processor_core.c processor_driver.c Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:40 ` [PATCH 02/12] ACPI: processor: mv processor_pdc.c processor_core.c Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:40 ` [PATCH 03/12] ACPI: processor: export acpi_get_cpuid() Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:40 ` [PATCH 04/12] ACPI: processor: move acpi_get_cpuid into processor_core.c Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:41 ` [PATCH 05/12] ACPI: processor: add internal processor_physically_present() Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:41 ` [PATCH 06/12] ACPI: processor: remove early _PDC optin quirks Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:41 ` [PATCH 07/12] ACPI: processor: driver doesn't need to evaluate _PDC Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:41 ` [PATCH 08/12] ACPI: processor: refactor internal map_lapic_id() Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:41 ` [PATCH 09/12] ACPI: processor: refactor internal map_x2apic_id() Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:41 ` [PATCH 10/12] ACPI: processor: refactor internal map_lsapic_id() Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 22:22   ` David Rientjes
2010-01-25 22:46     ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:41 ` [PATCH 11/12] ACPI: processor: push file static MADT pointer into internal map_madt_entry() Alex Chiang
2010-01-25 21:41 ` [PATCH 12/12] ACPI: processor core: style and sparse cleanups Alex Chiang
2010-02-02 23:17 ` Alex Chiang [this message]
2010-02-03  1:51   ` [PATCH 00/12] ACPI: processor driver vs. core Pallipadi, Venkatesh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100202231710.GA24718@ldl.fc.hp.com \
    --to=achiang@hp.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox