linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garrett <jeff@jgarrett.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: acpi_idle: Very idle Core i7 machine never enters C3
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:09:00 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100205160900.GA2736@jgarrett.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y6jkee1b.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:45:20PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> jeff@jgarrett.org (Jeff Garrett) writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was trying to chase down a theory that my desktop machine (a core i7)
> > is running warm (the fan sounds like it's at full speed all the time,
> > and I think it's not always acted this way -- hence the theory).
> >
> > powertop is never showing it spending any time in C3...
> >
> > I compiled a kernel without USB/sound/radeon, and ran without X.  I was
> > able to get the wakeups/sec down below 20, but no time is spent in C3.
> 
> [...]
> > This may be a complete red herring, but I added some printk logic to
> > acpi_idle_bm_check(), and it is getting called often, but bm_status is
> > always 1.  [I infer from this that the idle logic is trying to go into
> > C3, but this check is stopping it...  Unless I misread something.]
> 
> Normally a Core i7 (or any modern Intel systems) should not use
> bm_check at all. That's only for older systems that didn't support
> MWAIT with c-state hint, but relied on the old port based interface. 

bm_check = 1, bm_control = 0

I don't know what any of this means.  :)

I tried changing processor_idle.c.  It reads (for C3):
1106                         state->enter = pr->flags.bm_check ?
1107                                         acpi_idle_enter_bm :
1108                                         acpi_idle_enter_simple;

So it always calls acpi_idle_enter_bm in my case.  I tried modifying it
to call acpi_idle_enter_simple for entering C3 instead.  When I did
this, it did make it into C3 according to powertop, but the wakeups per
second grew by at least 10x.  I couldn't get that below ~400-800/s, and
the residency in C3 was limited to about ~50%, as reported by powertop.

> So something is already confused there.

Might just be me.  :)

> I think it should still work though.
> Of course if you really have a lot of bus mastering in the background
> then yes there will be no C3.
> 
> -Andi

I have no idea what counts as bus mastering (is it just DMA transfers to
PCI devices?)...  But with a fairly idle system, with things like USB
configured out, what could be doing it if it exists?  Would there be
some nice function I could instrument with a few printk's to, to see?  I
compiled with PCI_DEBUG=y, and "bus master" doesn't show up in the
dmesg.

-Jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-05 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-26  8:47 acpi_idle: Very idle Core i7 machine never enters C3 Jeff Garrett
2010-01-26 12:41 ` peng huang
2010-01-26 14:59   ` Jeff Garrett
2010-01-27 13:27     ` peng huang
2010-02-05 16:22       ` Jeff Garrett
2010-01-26 21:45 ` Andi Kleen
2010-02-05 16:09   ` Jeff Garrett [this message]
2010-02-05 17:45     ` Len Brown
2010-02-05 20:53       ` Jeff Garrett
2010-04-27  2:40       ` Philip Langdale
2010-04-27  7:26         ` Len Brown
2010-04-27 15:41           ` Philip Langdale
2010-04-27 12:47         ` Jeff Garrett
2010-04-30 14:57           ` Philip Langdale
2010-04-30 16:25           ` Len Brown
2010-04-30 17:44             ` Matthew Garrett
2010-04-30 18:35               ` Philip Langdale
2010-05-25  5:43                 ` Len Brown
2010-05-25  5:59                   ` Yu, Luming
2010-05-25 12:39                     ` Matthew Garrett
2010-05-25 12:43                     ` Matthew Garrett
2010-05-25 15:33                       ` Len Brown
2010-05-25 18:55                         ` Matthew Garrett
2010-07-21 21:31                           ` [PATCH] ACPI: make acpi_idle Nehalem-aware Len Brown
2010-07-22  0:53                             ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-07-22  7:47                             ` Andi Kleen
2010-07-22 15:57                               ` Len Brown
2010-07-22 21:21                                 ` [PATCH] ACPI: skip checking BM_STS if the BIOS doesn't ask for it Len Brown
2010-07-22 21:40                                   ` [PATCH] ACPI: create "processor.bm_check_disable" boot param Len Brown
2010-07-26  7:24                                     ` Andi Kleen
2010-07-27  0:19                                       ` Len Brown
2010-07-27 11:28                                         ` Andi Kleen
2010-07-28 18:58                                           ` Len Brown
2010-07-22 21:25                                 ` [PATCH] ACPI: make acpi_idle Nehalem-aware Iain
2010-07-22 21:53                                   ` Iain
2010-07-22 22:01                                   ` Len Brown
2010-07-23 12:40                                     ` Iain
2010-08-03  6:55                             ` Pavel Machek
2010-08-03  7:05                               ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-25 12:37                   ` acpi_idle: Very idle Core i7 machine never enters C3 Matthew Garrett
2010-05-25 15:40                     ` Len Brown
2010-07-22  5:34           ` Len Brown
2010-02-01 14:10 ` Pavel Machek
2010-02-05 16:30   ` Jeff Garrett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100205160900.GA2736@jgarrett.org \
    --to=jeff@jgarrett.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).