From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI: acpi_bus_{scan,bus,add}: return -ENODEV if no device was found
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:06:27 +0100
Message-ID: <201002111306.27138.trenn@suse.de>
References: <201001291748.52980.trenn@suse.de> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001312144030.4305@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:42066 "EHLO mx1.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753037Ab0BKMG3 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 11 Feb 2010 07:06:29 -0500
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001312144030.4305@localhost.localdomain>
Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, bjorn.helgaas@hp.com, kristen.c.accardi@intel.com

On Monday 01 February 2010 03:44:05 Len Brown wrote:
> applied

Eh, applied or queued?
Or I messed up my local git repo...
I tried test and release branch, couldn't find anything.
Same for the other one.

Thanks,

    Thomas