From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PNPACPI: add support for remote wakeup
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 23:42:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003082342.29031.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201003081521.59985.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
On Monday 08 March 2010, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Monday 08 March 2010 02:50:50 pm Alan Stern wrote:
> > This patch (as1354) adds remote-wakeup support to the pnpacpi driver.
> > The new can_wakeup method also allows other PNP protocol drivers
> > (pnpbios or iaspnp) to add wakeup support, but I don't know enough
> > about how they work to actually do it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
>
> We usually send PNP patches through the ACPI tree, so I added a CC
> to linux-acpi.
>
> > --- usb-2.6.orig/drivers/pnp/core.c
> > +++ usb-2.6/drivers/pnp/core.c
> > @@ -164,6 +164,9 @@ int __pnp_add_device(struct pnp_dev *dev
> > list_add_tail(&dev->global_list, &pnp_global);
> > list_add_tail(&dev->protocol_list, &dev->protocol->devices);
> > spin_unlock(&pnp_lock);
> > + if (dev->protocol->can_wakeup)
> > + device_set_wakeup_capable(&dev->dev,
> > + dev->protocol->can_wakeup(dev));
>
> I also added Rafael because he added code in acpi_bind_one() that
> does the same thing. I think the struct dev there will be the same
> one as &dev->dev here: we build both an acpi_device and a pnp_dev,
> and they refer to the same struct device.
>
> However, I think we still need your patch because acpi_bind_one()
> is only used for PCI devices, so it looks like there's currently
> no way to use acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() for non-PCI devices.
That's correct AFAICS.
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > return device_register(&dev->dev);
> > }
> >
> > Index: usb-2.6/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- usb-2.6.orig/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c
> > +++ usb-2.6/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c
> > @@ -121,17 +121,37 @@ static int pnpacpi_disable_resources(str
> > }
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
> > +static bool pnpacpi_can_wakeup(struct pnp_dev *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = dev->data;
> > + acpi_handle handle = acpi_dev->handle;
> > +
> > + return acpi_bus_can_wakeup(handle);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int pnpacpi_suspend(struct pnp_dev *dev, pm_message_t state)
> > {
> > struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = dev->data;
> > acpi_handle handle = acpi_dev->handle;
> > int power_state;
> >
> > + if (device_can_wakeup(&dev->dev)) {
> > + int rc = acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(&dev->dev,
> > + device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev));
> > +
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > + }
> > power_state = acpi_pm_device_sleep_state(&dev->dev, NULL);
> > if (power_state < 0)
> > power_state = (state.event == PM_EVENT_ON) ?
> > ACPI_STATE_D0 : ACPI_STATE_D3;
> >
> > + /* acpi_bus_set_power() often fails (keyboard port can't be
> > + * powered-down?), and in any case, our return value is ignored
> > + * by pnp_bus_suspend(). Hence we don't revert the wakeup
> > + * setting if the set_power fails.
> > + */
> > return acpi_bus_set_power(handle, power_state);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -140,6 +160,8 @@ static int pnpacpi_resume(struct pnp_dev
> > struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = dev->data;
> > acpi_handle handle = acpi_dev->handle;
> >
> > + if (device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev))
> > + acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(&dev->dev, false);
> > return acpi_bus_set_power(handle, ACPI_STATE_D0);
> > }
> > #endif
> > @@ -150,6 +172,7 @@ struct pnp_protocol pnpacpi_protocol = {
> > .set = pnpacpi_set_resources,
> > .disable = pnpacpi_disable_resources,
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
> > + .can_wakeup = pnpacpi_can_wakeup,
> > .suspend = pnpacpi_suspend,
> > .resume = pnpacpi_resume,
> > #endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-08 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1003081648510.1297-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
2010-03-08 22:21 ` [PATCH] PNPACPI: add support for remote wakeup Bjorn Helgaas
2010-03-08 22:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-06-07 20:50 Alan Stern
2010-06-12 21:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-14 15:02 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-06-14 15:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-06-14 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-28 21:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003082342.29031.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox