From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: ykzhao <yakui.zhao@intel.com>,
chen gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH]: ACPI: Automatically online hot-added memory
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:51:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003202151.57008.trenn@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BA3B315.6080905@redhat.com>
On Friday 19 March 2010 06:23:33 pm Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> > Blocking does not work.
> > But I have an idea, whatabout:
> > - CPU add rule which only adds a CPU if the corresponding Numa node
> > already has onlined memory
> > - Memory add rule which adds the memory and also onlines CPUs if the
> > Numa node still has offlined CPUs
> >
> > This has the side effect that you online a CPU which may have been
> > offlined on purpose if you hotadd memory on the same node..., a rather
> > uncommon case.
>
> That actually might be more of a problem than you think. It's not
> atypical that in the evening a system's components are offlined in order
> to save power.
This shouldn't be a problem currently, because offlined CPUs drain more
power than online ones:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5471
> Maintenance also is scheduled for downtime
I don't understand this part.
> so when
> memory is added to the system we may bring cpus into service
> erroneously. I think the "end-user" may not be too happy with this result.
...
> > I wanted to post something today, but I couldn't made it.
> > Still I more or less could prove that above works and I hopefully can
> > show some results on Monday.
>
> If it works then I'm all for it :)
Great. I'll hopefully post some patches in a new thread soon and try to
collect all interested people in CC.
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-20 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-09 14:12 [RFC PATCH]: ACPI: Automatically online hot-added memory Prarit Bhargava
2010-03-09 15:42 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-03-09 18:27 ` Prarit Bhargava
2010-03-10 1:57 ` ykzhao
2010-03-10 13:28 ` Prarit Bhargava
2010-03-11 0:55 ` ykzhao
2010-03-11 2:18 ` Prarit Bhargava
2010-03-11 8:07 ` ykzhao
2010-03-11 8:32 ` chen gong
2010-03-11 11:25 ` Prarit Bhargava
2010-03-12 13:18 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-03-17 18:47 ` Prarit Bhargava
2010-03-19 16:55 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-03-19 17:23 ` Prarit Bhargava
2010-03-20 20:51 ` Thomas Renninger [this message]
2010-03-24 14:40 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-03-24 15:16 ` Prarit Bhargava
2010-03-11 11:18 ` Prarit Bhargava
2010-03-12 1:31 ` ykzhao
2010-03-12 13:01 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-03-17 15:24 ` Prarit Bhargava
2010-03-09 19:10 ` Alex Chiang
2010-03-09 19:15 ` Prarit Bhargava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003202151.57008.trenn@suse.de \
--to=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).