Re: [patch v2] acpi_pad: "processor_aggregator" name too long

[Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>]

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:41:22PM +0800, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> cpi_device_class can only be 19 characters and a NULL terminator.
> 
> With the current name we get a buffer overflow in acpi_pad_add()
> 	strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_CLASS);
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> ---
> V2: Thanks to Pavel Machek for coming up with the right name for this.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
> index 7e52295..790aaa1 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
>  #include <acpi/acpi_bus.h>
>  #include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
>  
> -#define ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_CLASS	"processor_aggregator"
> +#define ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_CLASS	"cpu_aggregator"
>  #define ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_DEVICE_NAME "Processor Aggregator"
>  #define ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_NOTIFY 0x80
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(isolated_cpus_lock);
sorry for being later to reply. Better the name could be 'acpi_pad', which
is what the spec called. cpu_aggregator looks like a invented name.

Thanks,
Shaohua