From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: commit 9630bdd9 changes behavior of the poweroff - bug? Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:43:18 +0200 Message-ID: <201004082243.18393.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20100401133923.GA4104@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <201004072149.23791.rjw@sisk.pl> <20100408094905.GA3948@tiehlicka.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:41193 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758869Ab0DHUj6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:39:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100408094905.GA3948@tiehlicka.suse.cz> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Michal Hocko Cc: Matthew Garrett , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Barnes , ACPI Devel Maling List , pm list On Thursday 08 April 2010, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 07-04-10 21:49:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday 07 April 2010, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > Sorry for late reply, but I was AFK during holiday. > > > > > > On Fri 02-04-10 21:31:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Thursday 01 April 2010, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > On Thu 01-04-10 14:45:35, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 03:39:23PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Rafael, Matthew, > > > > > > > my laptop changed behavior during poweroff recently (after upgrading > > > > > > > from .33 to .34-rc1). The system seems to be powered off (status display > > > > > > > is off) at first glance but when I close the lid then I can hear a noise > > > > > > > which sounds like HDD parking and when I open lid again it starts > > > > > > > booting without poweroff button (same like when I suspend to RAM). > > > > > > > > > > > > Hm. At a guess, we're somehow managing to leave the lid GPE enabled at > > > > > > poweroff. Can you send the output of the acpidump command? > > > > > > > > > > Sure, see attached. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > Please also send the contents of /proc/acpi/wakeup. > > > > > > See attached. I have checked both kernels (with and without reverted > > > 9630bdd) and the output looks pretty much same. 2.6.34-rc3, however, > > > looks different a bit, so I am attaching it as well. > > > > Well, I fail to see the possible failure scenario, so let's first try a blind > > shot. > > > > Please check if this patch helps: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/86238/ > > No change, sorry. I have tried that on top of 0fdf867 which is not the > most recent one (does it make sense to retest on the most recent one > f5284e7?) There were no other changes in that area I know of, but the current git contains the above patch, so I'd recommend to use it for further testing. I'll try to prepare a debug patch for this issue. Rafael