public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Tony Vroon <tony@linx.net>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: commit 9630bdd9 changes behavior of the poweroff - bug?
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:27:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100413082756.GA5233@tiehlicka.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201004130101.54117.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Tue 13-04-10 01:01:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday 10 April 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday 09 April 2010, Tony Vroon wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 22:42 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > Please check if the patch below changes anything.
> > > >  drivers/acpi/wakeup.c |    4 ++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > That didn't change the behaviour for me, sorry.
> > 
> > Well, I would be sorry if it did, because the patch removed some useful code. :-)
> > 
> > > (I made sure to go through a full power down session before trying the
> > > patched kernel)
> > 
> > Thanks for testing.  So it looks like we don't disable the GPE during power off.
> > 
> > I'll try to figure out what's going on, please stay tuned.
> 
> Can you please check if the patch below changes the behavior?

Unfortunately, it didn't help either (I have tried on top of the fresh
rc4).

> 
> Rafael
> 
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/wakeup.c |    6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
> @@ -63,17 +63,17 @@ void acpi_enable_wakeup_device(u8 sleep_
>  	list_for_each_safe(node, next, &acpi_wakeup_device_list) {
>  		struct acpi_device *dev =
>  			container_of(node, struct acpi_device, wakeup_list);
> +		u8 action = ACPI_GPE_ENABLE;
>  
>  		if (!dev->wakeup.flags.valid)
>  			continue;
>  
>  		if ((!dev->wakeup.state.enabled && !dev->wakeup.prepare_count)
>  		    || sleep_state > (u32) dev->wakeup.sleep_state)
> -			continue;
> +			action = ACPI_GPE_DISABLE;
>  
> -		/* The wake-up power should have been enabled already. */
>  		acpi_set_gpe(dev->wakeup.gpe_device, dev->wakeup.gpe_number,
> -				ACPI_GPE_ENABLE);
> +				action);
>  	}
>  }
>  

-- 
Michal Hocko
L3 team 
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9    
Czech Republic

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-13  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20100401133923.GA4104@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
     [not found] ` <201004072149.23791.rjw@sisk.pl>
     [not found]   ` <20100408094905.GA3948@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
2010-04-08 20:43     ` commit 9630bdd9 changes behavior of the poweroff - bug? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-08 22:37       ` Tony Vroon
2010-04-08 22:54         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-09 20:42       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-09 21:20         ` Tony Vroon
2010-04-10 19:36           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-12 23:01             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-13  8:27               ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2010-04-13 20:53                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-14  7:58                   ` Michal Hocko
2010-04-16 18:00                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-19 11:59                       ` Michal Hocko
2010-04-19 15:19                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-25  2:35                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-25  3:15                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-26 15:05                             ` Michal Hocko
2010-04-26 16:22                               ` Len Brown
2010-04-27  7:04                                 ` Michal Hocko
2010-04-29 14:38                                 ` Tony Vroon
2010-04-26 18:51                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-27  6:51                                 ` Michal Hocko
2010-04-27 22:06                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-28 21:18                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100413082756.GA5233@tiehlicka.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tony@linx.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox