From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [git pull request] ACPI patches for 2.6.34-rc6 Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 01:17:23 +0200 Message-ID: <201005080117.23760.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <201005080039.45533.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:57217 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754396Ab0EGXQ0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2010 19:16:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Len Brown , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton On Saturday 08 May 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sat, 8 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Friday 07 May 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > Btw, why don't we just force the SCI_EN by hand? > > > > Because there are boxes that are broken right away by this. > > > > I have one on my desk in front of me. :-) > > Also if we check whether it was already set before? Yes. > The thing is, if that bit is clear (_after_ we've done the regular ACPI > setup), the box can't work correctly as far as I know. That's correct. But on that particular box acpi_enable() is necessary to make things work. Setting SCI_EN by hand makes it hang solid. Rafael