From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 1/2] suspend: Move NVS save/restore code to generic suspend functionality Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:09:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20100610140911.GA11193@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1275416390.3778.7.camel@maxim-laptop> <201006012331.59747.rjw@sisk.pl> <1275429125.5573.7.camel@maxim-laptop> <201006020040.22429.rjw@sisk.pl> <1275432410.6733.4.camel@maxim-laptop> <20100610135816.GG4514@ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:48031 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753068Ab0FJOJX (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:09:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100610135816.GG4514@ucw.cz> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: Maxim Levitsky , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , linux-pm On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 03:58:16PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Well... should we only do it in 'platform' hibernation mode? There are > machines that predate windows/acpi and still should hibernate. If they predate acpi then they won't declare any NVS regions. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org