From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bjorn Helgaas Subject: Re: [PATCH] PNPACPI: add support for remote wakeup Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:05:49 -0600 Message-ID: <201006140905.49388.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> References: <201006122344.00576.rjw@sisk.pl> <20100614150236.GA23339@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from g4t0014.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.17]:32842 "EHLO g4t0014.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754301Ab0FNPFt (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:05:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100614150236.GA23339@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Alan Stern , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton On Monday, June 14, 2010 09:02:36 am Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:44:00PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Len, Matthew, is anyone going to merge this patch? It looks entirely correct > > and useful. > > > > Or should I take it? > > Either Len, you or Bjorn would be my guesses. I don't have a tree to merge anything myself. I send PNP stuff through Len (and I'm OK with this particular patch). Bjorn