From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 20:56:08 +0200 Message-ID: <201006212056.09000.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20100621135857.GA21159@elliptictech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100621135857.GA21159-7BP4RkwGw0uXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Nick Bowler Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Maciej Rutecki , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Kernel Testers List , Network Development , Linux ACPI , Linux PM List , Linux SCSI List , Linux Wireless List , DRI List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Monday, June 21, 2010, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 00:11 Mon 21 Jun , Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.34, please let us > > know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know > > if any of the entries below are invalid. > > Didn't see this one in the list: > > Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/996907 Thanks, I'm going to add it to the list. Rafael