From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Save/Restore NVS area on suspend/resume too Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:06:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20100622120627.GB15944@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1275077971.20606.20.camel@maxim-laptop> <1275078137-21139-1-git-send-email-maximlevitsky@gmail.com> <20100621155313.GA1447@ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:41203 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756416Ab0FVMGg (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:06:36 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100621155313.GA1447@ucw.cz> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: Maxim Levitsky , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , linux-pm , Matthew Garrett On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 05:53:15PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Fri 2010-05-28 23:22:16, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > Although this is clear violation of ACPI spec. the other OS does that... > > > > So you are adding bugs... what about having them optional, probably > quirk-driven? What's the benefit of having an incomplete quirk table over just doing what the hardware expects? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org