From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: "acpi_apic_instance=2" works better Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 16:01:09 +0100 Message-ID: <20100701150109.GB1061@srcf.ucam.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:59704 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751512Ab0GAPBO (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 11:01:14 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Serg Alexv." Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 02:36:00PM +0400, Serg Alexv. wrote: > "acpi_apic_instance=2" works just awesome (-: What doesn't work without it? > [ 0.303948] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution > failed [\_SB_.PCI0._OSC] (Node f7013270), AE_NOT_FOUND Could you provide the full dmesg output and the output of the acpidump command (found in the pmtools package)? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org