From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: create "processor.bm_check_disable" boot param Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:28:41 +0200 Message-ID: <20100727112841.GC7813@basil.fritz.box> References: <20100525124325.GC7876@srcf.ucam.org> <20100525185507.GA15997@srcf.ucam.org> <20100722074750.GA22520@one.firstfloor.org> <87k4oiiu3x.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: Andi Kleen , Matthew Garrett , "Yu, Luming" , Philip Langdale , Jeff Garrett , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "venki@google.com" List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > > This needs to be also documented in Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt > > I thought about that and decided against it. > While we do document some driver specific modparams > in kernel-parameters.txt, I do not expect this one to > be used that often -- mostly for diagnosis of BIOS bugs. > I know of two machines that need it, > and both of those machines have a BIOS update > or a BIOS update in progress that make it unnecessary. I think even obscure parameters should be documented. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.