From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI / PCIe: Ask BIOS for control of all native services at once (v4)
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:43:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100728144358.5e2c12ce@virtuousgeek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201007282323.56351.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:23:56 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
>
> PCIe port service drivers ask the BIOS, through _OSC, for control of
> the services they handle. Unfortunately, each of them individually
> asks for control of the PCIe capability structure and if that is
> granted, some BIOSes expect that the other PCIe port services will be
> configured and handled by the kernel as well. If that is not the
> case (eg. one of the PCIe port service drivers is not loaded), the
> BIOS may be confused and may cause the system as a whole to misbehave
> (eg. on one of such systems enabling the native PCIe PME service
> without loading the native PCIe hot-plug service driver causes a
> storm of ACPI notify requests to appear).
>
> For this reason rework the PCIe port driver so that (1) it checks
> which native PCIe port services can be enabled, according to the
> BIOS, and (2) it requests control of all these services
> simultaneously. In particular, this causes pcie_portdrv_probe() to
> fail if the BIOS refuses to grant control of the PCIe capability
> structure, which means that no native PCIe port services can be
> enabled for the PCIe root complex the given port belongs to.
>
> Make it possible to override this behavior using a new command line
> switch pcie_ports= that can be set to 'auto' (ask the BIOS, the
> default), 'native' (use the PCIe native services regardless of the
> BIOS response to the control request), or 'compat' (do not use the
> PCIe native services at all).
>
> Accordingly, rework the existing PCIe port service drivers so that
> they don't request control of the services directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> ---
Kenji-san, are you ok with this version? I would like to get your ack
(and ideally your tested-by) for this one since it affects
functionality you need.
Thanks,
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-28 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-28 21:23 [PATCH] PCI / PCIe: Ask BIOS for control of all native services at once (v4) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-28 21:43 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2010-07-29 5:03 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-29 15:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-30 6:00 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30 6:16 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30 6:20 ` [PATCH 1/6] ACPI/PCI: cleanup acpi_pci_run_osc Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30 12:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-30 6:21 ` [PATCH 2/6] ACPI/PCI: do not preserve query result Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30 12:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-30 6:22 ` [PATCH 3/6] ACPI/PCI: optimize checks in acpi_pci_osc_control_set() Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30 12:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-30 6:23 ` [PATCH 4/6] ACPI/PCI: ask bios for control of all native services at once Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30 8:42 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-07-30 8:47 ` [PATCH] portdrv: Don't take control of AER if not required Hidetoshi Seto
2010-07-30 12:46 ` [PATCH 4/6] ACPI/PCI: ask bios for control of all native services at once Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-30 6:24 ` [PATCH 5/6] PCI: portdrv: disable native hot-plug interrupt Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30 6:25 ` [PATCH 6/6] PCI: portdrv: remove module_exit Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30 11:50 ` [PATCH] PCI / PCIe: Ask BIOS for control of all native services at once (v4) Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100728144358.5e2c12ce@virtuousgeek.org \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).