linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] ACPI/PCI: do not preserve query result
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:42:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201007301442.03241.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C526F5B.2050202@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Friday, July 30, 2010, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
> Currently, all the _OSC controls are queried at the same time in
> acpi_pci_osc_support() and the result is preserved for later
> acpi_pci_osc_control_set() call. But query result can vary depending
> on the combination of requested controls. Therefore, query result must
> not be preserved.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>

IMHO it would be _much_ simpler to change the definition of
acpi_pci_osc_control_get() in my original patch so that it executes
acp_pci_query_osc() unconditionally.

Rafael


> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c |   49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |    3 --
>  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.35-rc6/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.35-rc6.orig/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ linux-2.6.35-rc6/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -230,35 +230,42 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_run_osc(acpi
>  	return status;
>  }
>  
> -static acpi_status acpi_pci_query_osc(struct acpi_pci_root *root, u32 flags)
> +static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_query(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
> +					      u32 flags, u32 *result)
>  {
> -	acpi_status status;
> -	u32 result;
> -
> -	/* do _OSC query for all possible controls */
> -	flags &= OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS;
> -	status = acpi_pci_run_osc(root->device->handle,
> -				  root->osc_support_set | flags,
> -				  OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS,
> -				  true, &result);
> -	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> -		root->osc_support_set |= flags;
> -		root->osc_control_qry = result;
> -		root->osc_queried = 1;
> +	/* No need to run _OSC if requested control bits are already granted */
> +	flags &= OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS;
> +	if ((root->osc_control_set & flags) == flags) {
> +		*result = root->osc_control_set;
> +		return AE_OK;
>  	}
> -	return status;
> +	return acpi_pci_run_osc(root->device->handle,
> +				root->osc_support_set,
> +				root->osc_control_set | flags,
> +				true, result);
>  }
>  
>  static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_support(struct acpi_pci_root *root, u32 flags)
>  {
>  	acpi_status status;
>  	acpi_handle tmp;
> +	u32 result;
>  
>  	status = acpi_get_handle(root->device->handle, "_OSC", &tmp);
>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>  		return status;
>  	mutex_lock(&osc_lock);
> -	status = acpi_pci_query_osc(root, flags);
> +	/* No need to run _OSC if requested support bits are already set */
> +	flags &= OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS;
> +	if ((root->osc_support_set & flags) == flags)
> +		goto out;
> +	status = acpi_pci_run_osc(root->device->handle,
> +				  root->osc_support_set | flags,
> +				  root->osc_control_set,
> +				  true, &result);
> +	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> +		root->osc_support_set |= flags;
> +out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&osc_lock);
>  	return status;
>  }
> @@ -399,12 +406,10 @@ acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acp
>  		goto out;
>  
>  	/* Need to query controls first before requesting them */
> -	if (!root->osc_queried) {
> -		status = acpi_pci_query_osc(root, root->osc_support_set);
> -		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> -			goto out;
> -	}
> -	if ((root->osc_control_qry & control_req) != control_req) {
> +	status = acpi_pci_osc_control_query(root, control_req, &result);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> +		goto out;
> +	if ((result & control_req) != control_req) {
>  		printk(KERN_DEBUG
>  		       "Firmware did not grant requested _OSC control\n");
>  		status = AE_SUPPORT;
> Index: linux-2.6.35-rc6/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.35-rc6.orig/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> +++ linux-2.6.35-rc6/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> @@ -377,9 +377,6 @@ struct acpi_pci_root {
>  
>  	u32 osc_support_set;	/* _OSC state of support bits */
>  	u32 osc_control_set;	/* _OSC state of control bits */
> -	u32 osc_control_qry;	/* the latest _OSC query result */
> -
> -	u32 osc_queried:1;	/* has _OSC control been queried? */
>  };
>  
>  /* helper */
> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-30 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-28 21:23 [PATCH] PCI / PCIe: Ask BIOS for control of all native services at once (v4) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-28 21:43 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-07-29  5:03   ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-29 15:45     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-30  6:00       ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30  6:16         ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30  6:20           ` [PATCH 1/6] ACPI/PCI: cleanup acpi_pci_run_osc Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30 12:15             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-30  6:21           ` [PATCH 2/6] ACPI/PCI: do not preserve query result Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30 12:42             ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-07-30  6:22           ` [PATCH 3/6] ACPI/PCI: optimize checks in acpi_pci_osc_control_set() Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30 12:42             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-30  6:23           ` [PATCH 4/6] ACPI/PCI: ask bios for control of all native services at once Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30  8:42             ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-07-30  8:47               ` [PATCH] portdrv: Don't take control of AER if not required Hidetoshi Seto
2010-07-30 12:46             ` [PATCH 4/6] ACPI/PCI: ask bios for control of all native services at once Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-30  6:24           ` [PATCH 5/6] PCI: portdrv: disable native hot-plug interrupt Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30  6:25           ` [PATCH 6/6] PCI: portdrv: remove module_exit Kenji Kaneshige
2010-07-30 11:50         ` [PATCH] PCI / PCIe: Ask BIOS for control of all native services at once (v4) Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201007301442.03241.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).