From: Matthias Hopf <mhopf@suse.de>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
Oliver
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / PM: Traverse video_device_list for backlight restoration
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:11:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100803101157.GA29721@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100803100505.GA26948@suse.de>
A bit of background about this patch:
acpi_video_bus_get_devices() explicitly calls acpi_video_device_enumerate()
before acpi_video_bus_get_one_device(), which does acpi_video_device_bind().
In _enumerate(), active_list[] is created, with .bind_info explicitly set to
NULL, while the related .bind_info entry in video_device_list is set to the
acpi_video_device ptr in _bind().
The .bind_info is later used in acpi_video_resume() to re-set the backlight
- but it's only evaluated on the active_list[], on which all .bind_info are
NULL by construction. This results in backlight not being restored, if the
BIOS doesn't do this by itself already.
The patch resolves this by replacing the active_list[] traversal by a
video_device_list traversal, but due to the nature of the issue I'm unsure
whether the original issue isn't of more principal quality. I don't understand
why the list is (partially) transformed into an array in the first place,
especially as both the array *and* the list are used in the code...
Thanks
Matthias
--
Matthias Hopf <mhopf@suse.de> __ __ __
Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg (_ | | (_ |__ mat@mshopf.de
Phone +49-911-74053-715 __) |_| __) |__ R & D www.mshopf.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-03 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-03 10:05 [PATCH] ACPI / PM: Traverse video_device_list for backlight restoration Matthias Hopf
2010-08-03 10:11 ` Matthias Hopf [this message]
2010-08-04 1:27 ` Zhang Rui
2010-08-04 11:00 ` Matthias Hopf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100803101157.GA29721@suse.de \
--to=mhopf@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=julia@diku.dk \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).