From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ACPI: Memory Mapped I/O (MMIO) pre-mapping Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:34:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20101025183452.GA3527@gargoyle.fritz.box> References: <20101021201916.9220.5711.stgit@bob.kio> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:48112 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751316Ab0JYScq (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:32:46 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: Myron Stowe , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 11:38:22PM -0400, Len Brown wrote: > applied to acpi-test > > My comfort-level with these changes is not high. > > I'm open to your recommendations on if they are > too late/risky for this merge window -- or too > important to miss this merge window. The NMI handling is fairly important by itself, on the other hand it has been broken for a long time. But yes the patches were late unfortunately. I still think it would be better to push them out earlier than later simply to get more testing on more systems. That's essentially what they need and unfortunately the only really good way to get that is being part of a release. -Andi