From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 0/8] ACPI, APEI patches for 2.6.37 Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:01:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20101028160129.GA12628@elte.hu> References: <1288157312-10441-1-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.com> <1288174050.15336.1507.camel@twins> <20101027172343.GB22171@basil.fritz.box> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:38179 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758884Ab0J1QB6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:01:58 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101027172343.GB22171@basil.fritz.box> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Andi Kleen Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Huang Ying , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Len Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Luck, Tony" , BorislavPetkov , Andrew Morton , Don Zickus , Linus Torvalds * Andi Kleen wrote: > Peter, > > > All you've done is decreased the arch/x86/ footprint of the patch series, but > > neither you nor Andi have addressed the technical arguments against adding this > > ABI. > > What were the technical arguments? I don't remember any. You did not reply to my technical arguments: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/25/271 You did not reply to Thomas's technical arguments: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/26/71 Are you really claiming that you "don't remember any"? Ingo