Re: [PATCH 0/2] Generic hardware error reporting support

Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-19T13:38:15Z

On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 21:28 +0800, huang ying wrote:
>
> > Instead you present your work as a fait accompli, not a work in flux and
> > subject to change. You ask for it to be merged -- this does not come
> > across like a discussion, much less a request for co-operation.
>
> I heard about that LKML likes talk with code instead of idea. Am I wrong?

No, its your presentation of said code that's wrong.

You're missing the [RFC] tags and open questions in your Changelogs
like: EDAC could use it like so and so, does that sound acceptable
Mauro?

There is no mention you actually did talk to Mauro and Tony and what its
outcome was.