Re: [PATCH 0/2] Generic hardware error reporting support

huang ying
2010-11-19T13:49:38Z

On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 21:28 +0800, huang ying wrote:
>>
>> > Instead you present your work as a fait accompli, not a work in flux and
>> > subject to change. You ask for it to be merged -- this does not come
>> > across like a discussion, much less a request for co-operation.
>>
>> I heard about that LKML likes talk with code instead of idea. Am I wrong?
>
> No, its your presentation of said code that's wrong.
>
> You're missing the [RFC] tags and open questions in your Changelogs
> like: EDAC could use it like so and so, does that sound acceptable
> Mauro?

Maybe. We can not talk with code without that tag?

> There is no mention you actually did talk to Mauro and Tony and what its
> outcome was.

The main outcome is that we need a generic hardware error reporting
interface, that can be used by all hardware error reporting
mechanisms.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying