Re: [PATCH 0/2] Generic hardware error reporting support

huang ying
2010-11-19T13:28:37Z

On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 21:06 +0800, huang ying wrote:
>>
>> I lists the requirements and my solutions in my patch description of
>> [1/2] and [2/2]. If you have any question, please let me know.
>
> Those talk about _your_ requirements, it does not touch upon any of the
> concerns of the other parties, it doesn't even mention them beyond
> listing their existence.

They are welcome to talk about their requirement and opinion in the thread.

> It also, very specifically, does not mention if you did talk to any of
> those parties and what their thought on the matter was, nor does it ask
> them about their opinion.

Again opinion is welcome. I just want to talk with code.

> Instead you present your work as a fait accompli, not a work in flux and
> subject to change. You ask for it to be merged -- this does not come
> across like a discussion, much less a request for co-operation.

I heard about that LKML likes talk with code instead of idea. Am I wrong?

Best Regards,
Huang Ying