* [PATCH 0/13] ACPI / PM: Rework power resources management
@ 2010-11-24 23:01 Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-11-24 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Len Brown
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List, LKML, Linux-pm mailing list,
Matthew Garrett, Maciej Rutecki
Hi,
Unfortunately there are a few problems with ACPI power resources management
that should be fixed by the following series of patches.
Patch [1/13] is necessary to fix a recent regression in the mainline kernel and
patch [2/13] also should go into 2.6.37 IMO. The remaining patches are not so
urgent, but they all are necessary.
[1/13] - Fix regression if fan resume resulting from the rework of power
resources reference counting.
[2/13] - Do not reference count power resources that can't be turned on.
[3/13] - Rework acpi_power_get_inferred_state() so that it doesn't update
device->power.state behind the caller's back.
[4/13] - Introduce functions for handling lists of power resources.
[5/13] - Introduce helper function for reference counting power resources
for a given device and power state.
[6/13] - Introduce function for reading device power state without modifying
the device object.
[7/13] - Add function for device power state initialization.
[8/13] - Add function for updating device power state in a consistent way.
[9/13] - Register acpi_power_driver before scanning the root of the namespace.
[10/13] - Add power resource ACPI device objects as soon as they are needed.
[11/13] - Rework the management of ACPI power resources in the ACPI fan driver.
[12/13] - Drop acpi_bus_get_power() that has no users now.
[13/13] - Drop acpi_power_nocheck which isn't necessary any more.
The patches have been tested on my HP nx6325 (which is the only machine using
ACPI power resources I have) and a combo patch functionally equivalen to this
series has been tested by Maciej Rutecki.
Please apply.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/13] ACPI / PM: Rework power resources management
[not found] ` <AANLkTi=QH=SNyfZEaak6pYyCJchSwDp6sdn-yOSz2MRQ@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2010-11-25 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-11-26 8:12 ` Sedat Dilek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-11-25 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sedat.dilek; +Cc: LKML, Matthew Garrett, Len Brown, ACPI Devel Maling List
On Thursday, November 25, 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 25, 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Thursday, November 25, 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Sedat Dilek
> >> > <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Sedat Dilek
> >> > > <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> > >> Hi Rafael,
> >> > >>
> >> > [ ... ]
> >> > >> # grep "error:" build_linux-next_next20101124.dileks.2.log
> >> > >> /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37-rc3/debian/build/source_i386_none/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c:692:
> >> > >> error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_bus_get_power’
> >> > [ ... ]
> >> > >
> >> > > Guess this is conflicting with your patch
> >> > > "12-13-ACPI-PM-Drop-acpi_bus_get_power.patch".
> >> > >
> >> > > - Sedat -
> >> > >
> >> > > P.S.: Note to myself, add the following snippet for testing purposes:
> >> > >
> >> > > [ debian/config/i386/none/config.686 ]
> >> > > ...
> >> > > ##
> >> > > ## file: drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig
> >> > > ##
> >> > > # CONFIG_FUJITSU_LAPTOP is not set
> >> > > - EOT -
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > Applied on top of linux-next (next-20101125) and running.
> >> >
> >> > Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Great, thanks a lot!
> >>
> >> I should have said the patchset is on top of the current Linus' tree.
> >
> > Actually it also breaks with the current Linus' tree, but the appended patch
> > should fix it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rafael
> >
> > ---
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > Subject: Platform / x86: Make fujitsu_laptop use acpi_bus_update_power()
> >
> > Use the new function acpi_bus_update_power(), which is safer than
> > acpi_bus_get_power(), for getting device power state in
> > acpi_fujitsu_add().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > ---
> > drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> > @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static int acpi_fujitsu_add(struct acpi_
> > if (error)
> > goto err_free_input_dev;
> >
> > - result = acpi_bus_get_power(fujitsu->acpi_handle, &state);
> > + result = acpi_bus_update_power(fujitsu->acpi_handle, &state);
> > if (result) {
> > printk(KERN_ERR "Error reading power state\n");
> > goto err_unregister_input_dev;
> >
>
> Sorry, I crapped my own quotes.
> Missed to catch line #860?
Indeed, sorry. Updated patch is appended.
Rafael
---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Platform / x86: Make fujitsu_laptop use acpi_bus_update_power()
Use the new function acpi_bus_update_power(), which is safer than
acpi_bus_get_power(), for getting device power state in
acpi_fujitsu_add().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
@@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static int acpi_fujitsu_add(struct acpi_
if (error)
goto err_free_input_dev;
- result = acpi_bus_get_power(fujitsu->acpi_handle, &state);
+ result = acpi_bus_update_power(fujitsu->acpi_handle, &state);
if (result) {
printk(KERN_ERR "Error reading power state\n");
goto err_unregister_input_dev;
@@ -857,7 +857,7 @@ static int acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_add(struc
if (error)
goto err_free_input_dev;
- result = acpi_bus_get_power(fujitsu_hotkey->acpi_handle, &state);
+ result = acpi_bus_update_power(fujitsu_hotkey->acpi_handle, &state);
if (result) {
printk(KERN_ERR "Error reading power state\n");
goto err_unregister_input_dev;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/13] ACPI / PM: Rework power resources management
2010-11-25 20:45 ` [PATCH 0/13] ACPI / PM: Rework power resources management Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-11-26 8:12 ` Sedat Dilek
2010-11-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sedat Dilek @ 2010-11-26 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: LKML, Matthew Garrett, Len Brown, ACPI Devel Maling List
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Thursday, November 25, 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> > On Thursday, November 25, 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> On Thursday, November 25, 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Sedat Dilek
>> >> > <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Sedat Dilek
>> >> > > <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >> > >> Hi Rafael,
>> >> > >>
>> >> > [ ... ]
>> >> > >> # grep "error:" build_linux-next_next20101124.dileks.2.log
>> >> > >> /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37-rc3/debian/build/source_i386_none/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c:692:
>> >> > >> error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_bus_get_power’
>> >> > [ ... ]
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Guess this is conflicting with your patch
>> >> > > "12-13-ACPI-PM-Drop-acpi_bus_get_power.patch".
>> >> > >
>> >> > > - Sedat -
>> >> > >
>> >> > > P.S.: Note to myself, add the following snippet for testing purposes:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > [ debian/config/i386/none/config.686 ]
>> >> > > ...
>> >> > > ##
>> >> > > ## file: drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig
>> >> > > ##
>> >> > > # CONFIG_FUJITSU_LAPTOP is not set
>> >> > > - EOT -
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> > Applied on top of linux-next (next-20101125) and running.
>> >> >
>> >> > Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> Great, thanks a lot!
>> >>
>> >> I should have said the patchset is on top of the current Linus' tree.
>> >
>> > Actually it also breaks with the current Linus' tree, but the appended patch
>> > should fix it.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Rafael
>> >
>> > ---
>> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
>> > Subject: Platform / x86: Make fujitsu_laptop use acpi_bus_update_power()
>> >
>> > Use the new function acpi_bus_update_power(), which is safer than
>> > acpi_bus_get_power(), for getting device power state in
>> > acpi_fujitsu_add().
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c | 2 +-
>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
>> > ===================================================================
>> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
>> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
>> > @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static int acpi_fujitsu_add(struct acpi_
>> > if (error)
>> > goto err_free_input_dev;
>> >
>> > - result = acpi_bus_get_power(fujitsu->acpi_handle, &state);
>> > + result = acpi_bus_update_power(fujitsu->acpi_handle, &state);
>> > if (result) {
>> > printk(KERN_ERR "Error reading power state\n");
>> > goto err_unregister_input_dev;
>> >
>>
>> Sorry, I crapped my own quotes.
>> Missed to catch line #860?
>
> Indeed, sorry. Updated patch is appended.
>
> Rafael
>
>
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Subject: Platform / x86: Make fujitsu_laptop use acpi_bus_update_power()
>
> Use the new function acpi_bus_update_power(), which is safer than
> acpi_bus_get_power(), for getting device power state in
> acpi_fujitsu_add().
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static int acpi_fujitsu_add(struct acpi_
> if (error)
> goto err_free_input_dev;
>
> - result = acpi_bus_get_power(fujitsu->acpi_handle, &state);
> + result = acpi_bus_update_power(fujitsu->acpi_handle, &state);
> if (result) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "Error reading power state\n");
> goto err_unregister_input_dev;
> @@ -857,7 +857,7 @@ static int acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_add(struc
> if (error)
> goto err_free_input_dev;
>
> - result = acpi_bus_get_power(fujitsu_hotkey->acpi_handle, &state);
> + result = acpi_bus_update_power(fujitsu_hotkey->acpi_handle, &state);
> if (result) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "Error reading power state\n");
> goto err_unregister_input_dev;
>
Feel free to add for
"Platform-x86-Make-fujitsu_laptop-use-acpi_bus_update_power.patch":
Reported-and-Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
- Sedat -
# grep OK setup_linux-next_next20101126.dileks.1.log | grep ACPI-PM
(+) OK ACPI-PM/1-13-ACPI-PM-Check-device-state-before-refcounting-power-resources.patch
(+) OK ACPI-PM/2-13-ACPI-PM-Do-not-refcount-power-resources-that-can-t-be-turned-on.patch
(+) OK ACPI-PM/3-13-ACPI-PM-Prevent-acpi_power_get_inferred_state-from-making-changes.patch
(+) OK ACPI-PM/4-13-ACPI-PM-Add-functions-for-manipulating-lists-of-power-resources.patch
(+) OK ACPI-PM/5-13-ACPI-PM-Introduce-function-for-refcounting-device-power-resources.patch
(+) OK ACPI-PM/6-13-ACPI-PM-Introduce-__acpi_bus_get_power.patch
(+) OK ACPI-PM/7-13-ACPI-PM-Add-function-for-device-power-state-initialization.patch
(+) OK ACPI-PM/8-13-ACPI-PM-Add-function-for-updating-device-power-state-consistently.patch
(+) OK ACPI-PM/9-13-ACPI-PM-Register-acpi_power_driver-early.patch
(+) OK ACPI-PM/10-13-ACPI-PM-Register-power-resource-devices-as-soon-as-they-are-needed.patch
(+) OK ACPI-PM/11-13-ACPI-Fan-Rework-the-handling-of-power-resources.patch
(+) OK ACPI-PM/12-13-ACPI-PM-Drop-acpi_bus_get_power.patch
(+) OK ACPI-PM/13-13-ACPI-PM-Drop-acpi_power_nocheck.patch
(+) OK ACPI-PM-fix/Platform-x86-Make-fujitsu_laptop-use-acpi_bus_update_power.patch
# modinfo fujitsu-laptop
filename:
/lib/modules/2.6.37-rc3-686/kernel/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.ko
alias: dmi:*:svnFUJITSU:*:pvr:rvnFUJITSU:rnFJNB19C:*:cvrS7020:*
alias: dmi:*:svnFUJITSUSIEMENS:*:pvr:rvnFUJITSU:rnFJNB1E6:*:cvrS6420:*
alias: dmi:*:svnFUJITSUSIEMENS:*:pvr:rvnFUJITSU:rnFJNB1D3:*:cvrS6410:*
license: GPL
version: 0.6.0
description: Fujitsu laptop extras support
author: Jonathan Woithe, Peter Gruber, Tony Vroon
srcversion: FFA7AB6B6C940453C0946B4
alias: acpi*:FUJ02E3:*
alias: pnp:dFUJ02E3*
alias: acpi*:FUJ02B1:*
alias: pnp:dFUJ02B1*
alias: acpi*:FUJ02BF:*
alias: pnp:dFUJ02bf*
depends:
vermagic: 2.6.37-rc3-686 SMP mod_unload modversions 686
parm: use_alt_lcd_levels:Use alternative interface for
lcd_levels (needed for Lifebook s6410). (uint)
parm: disable_brightness_adjust:Disable brightness adjustment . (uint)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/13] ACPI / PM: Rework power resources management
2010-11-26 8:12 ` Sedat Dilek
@ 2010-11-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-11-26 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sedat.dilek; +Cc: LKML, Matthew Garrett, Len Brown, ACPI Devel Maling List
On Friday, November 26, 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 25, 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >> > On Thursday, November 25, 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> >> On Thursday, November 25, 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> >> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Sedat Dilek
> >> >> > <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Sedat Dilek
> >> >> > > <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > >> Hi Rafael,
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > [ ... ]
> >> >> > >> # grep "error:" build_linux-next_next20101124.dileks.2.log
> >> >> > >> /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37-rc3/debian/build/source_i386_none/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c:692:
> >> >> > >> error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_bus_get_power’
> >> >> > [ ... ]
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Guess this is conflicting with your patch
> >> >> > > "12-13-ACPI-PM-Drop-acpi_bus_get_power.patch".
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > - Sedat -
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > P.S.: Note to myself, add the following snippet for testing purposes:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > [ debian/config/i386/none/config.686 ]
> >> >> > > ...
> >> >> > > ##
> >> >> > > ## file: drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig
> >> >> > > ##
> >> >> > > # CONFIG_FUJITSU_LAPTOP is not set
> >> >> > > - EOT -
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Applied on top of linux-next (next-20101125) and running.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
> >> >>
> >> >> Great, thanks a lot!
> >> >>
> >> >> I should have said the patchset is on top of the current Linus' tree.
> >> >
> >> > Actually it also breaks with the current Linus' tree, but the appended patch
> >> > should fix it.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Rafael
> >> >
> >> > ---
> >> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> >> > Subject: Platform / x86: Make fujitsu_laptop use acpi_bus_update_power()
> >> >
> >> > Use the new function acpi_bus_update_power(), which is safer than
> >> > acpi_bus_get_power(), for getting device power state in
> >> > acpi_fujitsu_add().
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> >> > ---
> >> > drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c | 2 +-
> >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >
> >> > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> >> > ===================================================================
> >> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> >> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> >> > @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static int acpi_fujitsu_add(struct acpi_
> >> > if (error)
> >> > goto err_free_input_dev;
> >> >
> >> > - result = acpi_bus_get_power(fujitsu->acpi_handle, &state);
> >> > + result = acpi_bus_update_power(fujitsu->acpi_handle, &state);
> >> > if (result) {
> >> > printk(KERN_ERR "Error reading power state\n");
> >> > goto err_unregister_input_dev;
> >> >
> >>
> >> Sorry, I crapped my own quotes.
> >> Missed to catch line #860?
> >
> > Indeed, sorry. Updated patch is appended.
> >
> > Rafael
> >
> >
> > ---
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > Subject: Platform / x86: Make fujitsu_laptop use acpi_bus_update_power()
> >
> > Use the new function acpi_bus_update_power(), which is safer than
> > acpi_bus_get_power(), for getting device power state in
> > acpi_fujitsu_add().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > ---
> > drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> > @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static int acpi_fujitsu_add(struct acpi_
> > if (error)
> > goto err_free_input_dev;
> >
> > - result = acpi_bus_get_power(fujitsu->acpi_handle, &state);
> > + result = acpi_bus_update_power(fujitsu->acpi_handle, &state);
> > if (result) {
> > printk(KERN_ERR "Error reading power state\n");
> > goto err_unregister_input_dev;
> > @@ -857,7 +857,7 @@ static int acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_add(struc
> > if (error)
> > goto err_free_input_dev;
> >
> > - result = acpi_bus_get_power(fujitsu_hotkey->acpi_handle, &state);
> > + result = acpi_bus_update_power(fujitsu_hotkey->acpi_handle, &state);
> > if (result) {
> > printk(KERN_ERR "Error reading power state\n");
> > goto err_unregister_input_dev;
> >
>
> Feel free to add for
> "Platform-x86-Make-fujitsu_laptop-use-acpi_bus_update_power.patch":
>
> Reported-and-Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Thanks for testing!
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/13] ACPI / PM: Rework power resources management
[not found] <AANLkTimahUpEL3cV6pFhkN8KqrphfVMSOw8xAN2=9jPy@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <201011252129.02027.rjw@sisk.pl>
@ 2010-12-13 15:43 ` Sedat Dilek
2010-12-14 9:20 ` Sedat Dilek
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sedat Dilek @ 2010-12-13 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: LKML, len.brown, Linux ACPI, Matthew Garrett, platform-driver-x86,
Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael,
nice to see your patchset is in linux-next (next-20101213) now.
More precisely in linux-acpi-2.6: 1/13 + 2/13 in release and rest/13
in test GIT branch.
What about the fix
"Platform-x86-Make-fujitsu_laptop-use-acpi_bus_update_power.patch"
[1]?
Will this go over platform-x86/linux-next into linux-next GIT tree?
Are you co-ordinating this with mjg?
Regards,
- Sedat -
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/357422/
[2] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mjg59/platform-drivers-x86.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-next
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/13] ACPI / PM: Rework power resources management
2010-12-13 15:43 ` Sedat Dilek
@ 2010-12-14 9:20 ` Sedat Dilek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sedat Dilek @ 2010-12-14 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: LKML, len.brown, Linux ACPI, Matthew Garrett, platform-driver-x86,
Stephen Rothwell
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> nice to see your patchset is in linux-next (next-20101213) now.
> More precisely in linux-acpi-2.6: 1/13 + 2/13 in release and rest/13
> in test GIT branch.
>
> What about the fix
> "Platform-x86-Make-fujitsu_laptop-use-acpi_bus_update_power.patch"
> [1]?
> Will this go over platform-x86/linux-next into linux-next GIT tree?
> Are you co-ordinating this with mjg?
>
> Regards,
> - Sedat -
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/357422/
> [2] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mjg59/platform-drivers-x86.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-next
>
Thanks, the patch is now included in linux-next (next-20101214) (see [1]).
- Sedat -
[1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5fd12c41e206d6bfda6eef1ed50e995a293e0777
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-12-14 9:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <AANLkTimahUpEL3cV6pFhkN8KqrphfVMSOw8xAN2=9jPy@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <201011252129.02027.rjw@sisk.pl>
[not found] ` <AANLkTi=QH=SNyfZEaak6pYyCJchSwDp6sdn-yOSz2MRQ@mail.gmail.com>
2010-11-25 20:45 ` [PATCH 0/13] ACPI / PM: Rework power resources management Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-11-26 8:12 ` Sedat Dilek
2010-11-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-13 15:43 ` Sedat Dilek
2010-12-14 9:20 ` Sedat Dilek
2010-11-24 23:01 Rafael J. Wysocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox